Enterprise Architecture and Systems Thinking Bibliography

The following 500+ references relates to enterprise architecture and systems thinking.

  • Abbaszadeh, N., Crow, M., El-Khoury, M., Gandomi, J., Kuwayama, D., MacPherson, C., Nutting, M., Parker, N, and Weiss; T., Provincial Reconstruction Teams: Lessons and Recommendations. Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs, Princeton University, 2008.
  • Ackermann, Fran and Eden, Colin (2005) ‘Using Causal Mapping with Group Support Systems to Elicit an Understanding of Failure in Complex Projects: Some Implications for Organizational Research’, Group Decision and Negotiation, 14(5), pp. 355-376, [online] Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10726-005-8917-6.
  • Ackoff, R. L. 1971. “Towards a System of Systems Concepts.” Management Science, 17(11).
  • Ackoff, R. L. 1989. From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16 : 3-9.
  • Ackoff, R., Emery, F.E. (1972) On Purposeful Systems. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
  • Ackoff, R.L., Ackoff’s Best: His Classic Writings on Management, New York, Wiley 1999
  • Aier, Stephan and Winter, Robert (2008) ‘Virtual Decoupling for IT/Business Alignment – Conceptual Foundations, Architecture Design and Implementation Example’, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(2), pp. 150-163, [online] Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s12599-008-0010-7 (Accessed 5 August 2011).
  • Aldrich, Howard. 1979. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
  • Alexander, C. 1979. The Timeless Way of Building. New York, Oxford University Press
  • Allega, Philip, and Betsy Burton. Enterprise Architecture in Organizations Beyond the Tipping Point. Stamford: Gartner, 2011.
  • Ambler, G.: Systems Thinking as a Leadership Practice (2006)
  • Andersson, B., Bider, I., Johannesson, P. and Perjons, E., 2005. “Towards a Formal Definition of Goal-Oriented Business Process Patterns”, BPMJ, Emerald, Vol. 11, No 6, pp. 650-652.
  • Andersson, J., Evers, T., and Sjöstedt, G. (2011) Private Sector Actors & Peacebuilding. Stockholm: Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
  • Anonymous. 2011. What is Environmental Complexity? Accounting for Management. http://www.accountingformanagement.com/index.htm.
  • Ansoff, H.I. 1965. Corporate Strategy, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Arnell, K et al (2009) NATO and Sweden Joint Live Experiment on NEC: A First Step Towards a NEC Realization. Reference Document DOP-D125-09. NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency.
  • Arnold, S., and Lawson, H. 2004. “Viewing Systems from a Business Management Perspective, Systems Engineering.” The Journal of The International Council on Systems Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp 229-242.
  • Ashby, W. R. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Ashby, W.R. 1958. “Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems,” Cybernetica, (1:2), p. 83-99.
  • Assimakopoulos, Nikitas and Dimitriou, Nikolaos (2006) ‘A cybernetic framework for viable virtual enterprises: The use of VSM and PSM systemic methodologies’, Kybernetes, 35(5), pp. 653-667, [online] Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/03684920610664681 (Accessed 22 December 2011).
  • Atkinson, Paul and Coffey, Amanda (2003) ‘Revisiting the Relationship Between Participant Observation and Interviewing. Postmodern Interviewing.’, In Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. (eds.), Postmodern Interviewing, Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Avison, D., J. Jones, P. Powell and D. Wilson (2004) Using and validating the strategic alignment model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13, pp. 223–246.
  • Bailey, Ian. 2006. A Simple Guide to Enterprise Architecture. URL: http://www.modelfutures.com/file_download/4/SimpleGuideToEA.pdf.
  • Bakken, Tore and Herenes, Tore (2003) ‘Introduction: Niklas Luhmann’s autopoietic theory and organization studies – A space of connections’, In Bakken, T. and Hernes, T. (eds.), Autopoietic Organisation Theory, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Business School Press, pp. 9-22.
  • Barney JB 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy, Management Science, 32 (10), 1986, pp 1231-1241.
  • Barney JB 1989. Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: A comment. Management Science, 35 (12), 1989, pp 1511-1513.
  • Barney JB 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17 (1), 1991, pp 99-120.
  • Barton, John, Stephens, John and Haslett, Tim (2009a) ‘Action Research: Its Foundations in Open Systems Thinking and Relationship to the Scientific Method’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(6), pp. 475-488, [online] Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11213-009-9148-6 (Accessed 11 September 2011).
  • Barton, John, Stephens, John and Haslett, Tim (2009b) ‘Action Research: Its Foundations in Open Systems Thinking and Relationship to the Scientific Method’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(6), pp. 475-488.
  • Bash, C., Cader, T., Chen, Y., Gmach, D., Kaufman, R., Milojicic, D., Shah, A., Sharma, P.: Cloud Sustainability Dashboard, Dynamically Assessing Sustainability of Data Centers and Clouds, HP Laboratories, HPL-2011-148 (2011); available at: www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2011/HPL-2011-148.pdf
  • Bean, Sally (2010) ‘Re-thinking Enterprise Architecture using Systems and Complexity Approaches’, Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 6(4), pp. 7-13.
  • Beer, M., Eisenbach, R.A., Spector, B., Why Change Programs Don’t Produce Change, Harvard Business Review, November/December 1990, pp. 158-166
  • Beer, Stafford. 1972. Brain Of The Firm, London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.
  • Beer, Stafford. 1979. The Heart of Enterprise, John Wiley, London and New York
  • Beer, Stafford. 1985. Diagnosing the System for Organisations, Wiley, Chichester and New York.
  • Beer, Stafford. 2002. “What is Cybernetics?” Kybernetes, 2002: 209-219.
  • Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen (2010) ‘Triple Task Method: Systemic, Reflective Action Research’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(6), pp. 443-452,
  • Bellinger, G., 2011. Systemic Perspective , Volume I. Foundations.
  • Bendz, J. and Lawson, H. 2001. “A Model for Deploying Life-Cycle Process Standards in the Change Management of Complex Systems, Systems Engineering.” The Journal of The International Council on Systems Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp 107-117.
  • Bente, Stefan. Collaborative Enterprise Architecture. Morgan Kaufmann, 2012.
  • Bernard, Scott A. 2005. An Introduction To Enterprise Architecture: Second Edition 2nd ed., AuthorHouse.
  • Bernus, P., Nemes, L., Williams, T.J. (Eds) (1996) Architectures for Enterprise Integration . London : Chapman and Hall.
  • Bernus, P., L. Nemes, and G. Schmidt. 2003. Handbook on Enterprise Architecture, Springer Verlag, West Berlin, Germany
  • Bertalanffy, Ludwig Von (2003) General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, George Braziller Inc.
  • Bestyrelsen for den nationale EPJ-organisation (2007) Strategiske udviklingsveje for EPJ, Deloitte.
  • Bider I., Perjons E. and Elias M., 2012. “Untangling the Dynamic Structure of an Enterprise by Applying a Fractal Approach to Business Processes”, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP), Vol. 134, Springer, pp. 61-76.
  • Bider, I., 2002. State-oriented business process modeling: principles, theory and practice, PhD thesis, KTH, Stockholm.
  • Bider, I., Bellinger, G., and Perjons, E., 2011. “Modeling an Agile Enterprise: Reconciling Systems and Process Thinking”. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP), Vol. 92, Springer, pp. 238-252.
  • Bider, I., Johannesson, P., and Schmidt, R., 2011. “Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Vol. 6741, Springer, pp. 299-313.
  • Bider, I., Perjons, E., and Johannesson, P., 2010. “In Search of the Holy Grail: Integrating social software with BPM. Experience report”, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP), Vol. 50, Springer, pp. 1-13.
  • Bider, I., Perjons, E., and Johannesson, P., 2011. “A strategy for merging social software with business process support”, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP), Vol. 66, Part 4, Springer, pp.372-383.
  • Bilder, I., Bellinger, G. and Perjons, E. 2013. “Modeling an Agile Enterprise: Reconciling Systems and Process Thinking.” appearing in this book.
  • Blanchard, B. S., and W. J. Fabrycky. 2010. Systems engineering and analysis. Prentice-hall international series in industrial and systems engineering. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
  • Boardman, J. and Sauser, B. 2008. Systems Thinking – Coping with 21st Century Problems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Boyd, J. R. 1987. “An Organic Design for Command and Control, A Discourse on Winning and Losing.” Unpublished lecture notes (Maxwell AFB, Ala. Air University).
  • Brand, S. 1997 How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. London, Phoenix
  • Brier, S. 2006. ‘The cybersemiotic model of communication: An evolutionary model of the threshold between semiosis and informational exchange’, Semiotica, 2006(158), pp. 255-296, [online] Available from: http://www.reference-global.com/doi/abs/10.1515/SEM.2006.008.
  • Brier, Søren, Baecker, Dirk and Thyssen, Ole (2011) ‘Foreword : Luhmann Applied — For What ?’, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 14(c), pp. 5-10.
  • Britto, Christian Maciel (2011) ‘Sustainable Community Development: A Brief Introduction to the Multi-Modal Systems Method’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(6), pp. 533-544, [online] Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11213-011-9206-8 (Accessed 22 December 2011).
  • Brown, J.S and P. Duguid 2002. The Social Life of Information. Boston, Mass., Harvard Business School
  • Brynjolfsson, E, Hitt, L., Paradox Lost? Firm Level Evidence on the Returns to Information System Spending, Management Science, Vol, 42, No. 4, 1996, pp. 541-558
  • Buckl, S., Schweda, CM, and Matthes, F. (2009) A Viable System Perspective on Enterprise Architecture Management. In Proceedings of SMC, 1pp. 483-1488.
  • Bunge, M.A.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol.4, A World of Systems (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 1979)
  • Burlton, R.T., Business Process Management, Indianapolis, Sams Publishing 2001
  • Burns, T., Mechanistic versus Organismic Structures (1963), In: Pugh, D.S., Organizational Theory, London, Penguin Books 1990
  • Burrell, G. and Morgan, Gareth (1985) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Gower Publishing Ltd.
  • Burrell, Gibson and Morgan, Gareth (1979) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis : elements of the sociology of corporate life, Sociology The Journal Of The British Sociological Association, Heinemann, [online] Available from: http://sonify.psych.gatech.edu/~ben/references/burrell_sociological_paradigms_and_organisational_analysis.pdf.
  • Burton, Betsy, and Philip Allega. Beyond the Tipping Point: EA Is Strategic. Stamford: Gartner, 2011.
  • Bygstad, B. (2010), Generative mechanisms for innovation in information infrastructures. Journal of Information and Organization, 20:3-4, Pp. 156-168.
  • Campbell, B. (2005). Alignment: Resolving ambiguity within bounded choices, PACIS 2005, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1–14.
  • Cannon, A. R., and C. H. St. John. 2007. “Measuring Environmental Complexity: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment.” Organizational Research Methods 10 (2): 296-321.
  • Cardwell, Geoff (2008) ‘The influence of Enterprise Architecture and process hierarchies on company success’, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19(1-2), pp. 47-55, [online] Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14783360701601959 (Accessed 7 July 2011).
  • Carlock, Paul and Robert Fenton. 2001. “System of Systems (SoS) Enterprise Systems Engineering for Information-Intensive Organizations,” Systems Engineering Journal, Vol 4, No 4, 242-261.
  • CGSDI, Consultative Group on Sustainable Development Indicators: Dashboard of Sustainability (2011); available at: www.iisd.org/cgsdi/dashboard.asp.
  • Chan, Y. E. and B. H. Reich (2007). IT alignment: what have we learned? Journal of Information Technology (2007) 22, pp. 297–315.
  • Charas, P., Johannisson, P., & Ostberg, O., A Philosophy of Public Service – Architectural Principles for Digital Democracy. International Journal of Public Information Systems, 2007:2, Pp. 89-99.
  • Checkland, P. 1985. From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(9), pp. 757-767.
  • Checkland, P. 1993. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  • Checkland, P. 1999. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice – Includes a 30 year Retrospective, JohnWiley, Chichester, UK.
  • Checkland, P. and Sholes, J. 1990. Soft System Methodology in Action, Wiley, New York.
  • Checkland, P., Holwell, S. 2004. “Classic” OR and “Soft OR – an asymmetric complementarity. In Systems Modelling Theory and Practice. M Pidd (ed), Chichester, Wiley
  • Checkland, Peter and Scholes, Jim (1993a) Soft Systems Methodology in Action, New York, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Checkland, Peter and Scholes, Jim (1993b) Soft systems methodology: a 30-year retrospective, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, [online] Available from: http://books.google.com/books?id=R2dQAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1.
  • Cherns, A.B. 1976. “Principles of Socio-technical Design,” Human Relations, 29, pp-783-92.
  • Child, J. 1972. “Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice.” Sociology 6: 2–21.
  • Choi, Jae, Nazareth, Derek L. and Jain, Hemant K. (2010) ‘Implementing Service-Oriented Architecture in Organizations’, Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), pp. 253-286, [online] Available from: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260409 (Accessed 1 September 2011).
  • Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R., Bower, J. L, Hamermesh, G., and Porter, M. E. 1982. Business Policy: Text and Cases (5th ed), Homewood, IL:Irwin.
  • Ciborra, Claudio U. (2001) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, OUP Oxford, [online] Available from: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Control-Drift-Corporate-Information-Infrastructures/dp/0199246637.
  • CIO Council. 1999. Federal enterprise architecture framework (FEAF). Washington, DC: Chief Information Officer (CIO) Council.
  • Coase, R. H. (1937) ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, New Series, 4(16), pp. 386 – 405.
  • Cochran, D.S., and V. A. Reynal. 1996. Axiomatic Design of Manufacturing Systems, The Lean Aircraft Initiative. Cambridge, MA: The Lean Aircraft Initiative, Center of Technology and Industrial Development, MIT.
  • Collins, J., Hansen, M.: Great By Choice: Uncertainty Chaos, and Luck—Why Some Thrive Despite Them All, HarperCollins Publishers, New York (2011).
  • Conant, R. C. & Ashby W.R. (1970) Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system Int. J. Systems Sci. vol. 1, No. 2, 89-97
  • Connor, R. and Mackenzie, P. (2003). “The leadership jigsaw – finding the missing piece,” Business Strategy Review, 14 (1), pp. 59–66.
  • Conway, M. E. (1968), “How do Committees Invent?”, Datamation14: 28–31
  • Cook-Greuter, S. (2005). “Ego Development: Nine Levels of Increasing Embrace”.
  • Coy, P.: Japan: Economic Aftershocks, Bloomberg Businessweek (March 30, 2011); available at: www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_15/b4223012614574.htm.
  • Crosby, P., (1992) The Eternally Successful Organization, Signet, Reprint Edition.
  • Danske Regioner (2010) Pejlemærker for Sundheds-IT 2010.
  • Davidz, H. 2012. Systems Engineering Competency Knowledge Area. Article in the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBOK). Published by the Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKASE). www.bkcase.org.
  • Davis, Jerome D. (2006) ‘“And then there were four..” A Thumbnail History of Oil Industry Restructuring, 1971-2005’, In Davis, J. D. (ed.), The Changing World of Oil: An Analysis of Corporate Change and Adaptation, Hampshire, Ashgate Publishing Limited, pp. 1-12.
  • De Geus, A. 2002. The Living Company, Harvard Business Press.
  • de Guerre, D 2000. “The codetermination of cultural change over time,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, (13:5), pp. 645-663
  • de Guerre, D., M. Noon, & Salter, Sam (1997). Syncrude Canada Limited: A Canadian Success Story. Association for Quality and Participation Annual Spring Conference, Clevland, AQP.
  • DeGennaro, T. 2010. The profile of corporately supported EA groups: Tactics for improving corporate management’s support for EA in large firms. Forrester, September.
  • Delauzun F, Hobbs M, Langley P, Morecroft JDW, Morecroft LE 1996. The BBC world service microworld user guide, System Dynamics Group educational document ED-0003-A, Decision Technology Centre, London Business School, August 1996.
  • Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the crisis. MIT Center for Advance Engineering Study.
  • Denmark, White Paper on Enterprise Architecture, Copenhagen, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, 2003
  • Denning, P., Medina-Mora, R., Completing the loops, in: ORSA/TIMS Interfaces, Vol. 25, No. 3 May-June 1995, pp 42-57
  • DeRosa, J. K. 2005. “Enterprise Systems Engineering,” Air Force Association, Industry Day, Day 1, Danvers, MA, 4 August 2005,
  • DeRosa, J. K. 2006. “An Enterprise Systems Engineering Model,” INCOSE Symposium Proceedings.
  • Des Chene, D. Spirits & Clocks : Machine & Organism in Descartes. New York: Cornelle University, 2001.
  • Dess, G.G., and D.W. Beard. 1984. “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1): 52–73.
  • Dierickx I, Cool K 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage, Management Science, 35 (12), 1989, pp 1504-1510.
  • Dietz, J.L.G., 2006. Enterprise Ontology – theory and methodology, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Berlin, New York 2006.
  • Dietz, J.L.G., Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Enterprise Ontology in Enterprise Engineering, Proceedings of the ACM SAC, 2008
  • Dietz, J.L.G., The Extensible Architecture Framework (xAF), Version 2, Delft University of Technology 2004 (http://www.naf.nl/content/bestanden/xaf-1.1_fe.pdf)
  • Dijkstra, E.W., A Discipline of Programming, Prentice-Hall series in Automatic Computation, New Jersey, 1976
  • DoD. 2004. DoD architecture framework (DODAF), version 1.0. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
  • Doucet, G., Gøtze, J., Saha, P., Bernard, S., 2009, Coherency Management: Architecting the Enterprise for Alignment, Agility, and Assurance, AuthorHouse.
  • Dove, R. 2001. Response ability: The language, structure, and culture of the agile organization. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dove, R. Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise. in Paradigm Shift International [database online]. Questa, NM, USA, 1999Available from http://www.parshift.com/docs/KmRaAeX.htm (accessed 2010).
  • Dove, R., (2001) Response Ability; The Language, Structure, and Culture of the Agile Enterprise, Wiley and Sons.
  • Drobik, A., Enterprise Architecture: The Business Issues and Drivers, http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=366199
  • Drucker, P. (1954) The Practice of Management, Harper.
  • Duncan, R. 1972. “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (3): 313-327.
  • Eckes, G., The Six-Sigma Revolution, New York, Wiley 2001
  • Egnell, R., and Nilsson, C., Swedish civil-military cooperation in international efforts: From promising concept to concrete action. The Royal Swedish Academy of War Sciences Proceedings and Journal, 2011:1, 75-93 (In Swedish, English summary).
  • Elliott, C., and P. Deasley. 2007. Creating systems that work–principles of engineering systems for the 21st century. Vol. (n/a). London, England: Royal Academy of Engineering.
  • Emery, F. E. 1959. Characteristics of socio-technical systems: The emergence of a new paradigm of work, Canberra, ANU/CCE.
  • Emery, F. E. 1976. In Pursuit of Ideals, Canberra, ANU/CCE.
  • Emery, F. E. and Thorsrud, E. 1969. Form and Content in Industrial Democracy, London, Tavistock.
  • Emery, F.E. 1972. “Characteristics of Socio-Technical Systems”,. In Design of Jobs, Davis, L.E. and Taylor, J.C. (eds.), Penguin Books, pp. 157-186.
  • Emery, M. 1993. “Participative Design for Participative Democracy,” Canberra, ANU/CCE.
  • Emery, M. 2000. “The Current Version of Emery‘s Open Systems Theory,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, (13:5), pp 685-703.
  • Emery, Merrelyn (2000) ‘The Current Version of Emery ’ s Open Systems Theory’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(5), pp. 623-643.
  • Endenburg, G. (1988). Sociocracy: The Organization of Decision-Making, Rotterdam, Sociocratic Center.
  • EPA, Environmental Protection Agency: Life Cycle Assessment Research website (2011); available at: www.epa.gov/nrmrl/std/lca/lca.html.
  • Eronen, O. (2008) PRT Models in Afghanistan. Approaches to Civil-Military Integration. CMC. Finland Civilian Crisis Management Studies, 1(5).
  • Espejo, R., and A. Gill. 1997. The Viable System Model as a Framework for Understanding Organisations. 1997. Phrontis Limited & SYNCHO Limited. www.phrontis.com/vsm.
  • Espejo, R., Harnden, R. (Eds.) (1989) The viable system model: interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Espinosa, A., R. Harnden, and J. Walker. 2007. “Beyond hierarchy: a complexitymanagement perspective.” Kybernetes 36 (3/4): 333-347.
  • Esty, D., Simmons, P.J.: The Green to Gold Business Playbook: How to Implement Sustainability Practices for Bottom-Line Results in Every Business Function, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2011).
  • European Commission (2010) Towards interoperability for European public services. COM(2010) 744.
  • Eveleens, J. L. and Verhoef, C. 2010. “The Rise and Fall of the Chaos Report Figures,” IEEE Software Journal, January-Febuary, p. 30-36
  • Fez-Barringten, Barie (2009) ‘Metaphor as an Inference from Sign’, Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 5(4).
  • Flood, R. L. (1990) ‘Liberating Systems Theory: Toward Critical Systems Thinking’, Human Relations, 43(1), pp. 49-75, [online] Available from: http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/001872679004300104 (Accessed 5 October 2011).
  • Flood, R.L. 1998. Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning within the unknowable, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Flood, R.L. and Carson, E.R. 1998. Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, Second Edition, Penum Press, London and New York.
  • Flood, Robert L. and Carson, Ewart R. (1993) Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, New York, Plenum Press.
  • Fonstad, N. and D. Robertson (2006) Transforming a Company, Project by Project: The IT Engagement Model. MIS Quarterly Executive. 5:1. pp. 1-14.
  • Fornell, C. 2001. “The Science of Satisfaction.” Harvard Business Review, 79, 3, March 120-121.
  • Forrester JW 1961. Industrial Dynamics, Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA, 1961.
  • Forrester JW 1992. Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling, European Journal of Operational Research, 59 (1), 1992, pp 42-63.
  • Forrester, J.W. 1975. Collected Papers of Jay W. Forrester, Pegasus Communications.
  • Fowler, J.W., Streib, H. and Keller, B. (Eds.) (2004). Manual for Faith Development Research. 3rd edition.
  • Frerks, G., Klem, B., Laar, S. van, and Klingeren, M. van. Principles and pragmatism: civil-military action in Afghanistan and Liberia. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, Bart Kleim Research Report, 2006.
  • Gall, Nicholas, David Newman, Philip Allega, Anne Lapkin, and Robert A. Handler. Introducing Hybrid Thinking for Transformation, Innovation and Strategy. Gartner, 2010.
  • Galliers, R,D., Baets, W.R., Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Chichester, Wiley 1998
  • Gartner. “Enterprise Architecture Hype Cycle.” Technology Research & Business Leader Insight | Gartner. Juli 2010A. http://www.gartner.com/hc/images/201646_0001.gif (accessed Oktober 26, 2010).
  • Gartner. Gartner’s Enterprise Architecture Hype Cycle Reveals Two Generations of Enterprise Architecture. 5 August 2010B. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1417513 (accessed December 14, 2010).
  • Gartner. Gartner’s Hype Cycle. 2 Maj 2011C. http://www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp (accessed Maj 2, 2011).
  • Gary MS, Kunc M, Morecroft JDW, Rockart SF 2008. System Dynamics and Strategy, System Dynamics Review 24(4), 407-429, 2008.
  • Gawande, A.: The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right, Metropolitan Books, New York (2010).
  • Gebala, D.A., and N.P. Suh. 1992. “An application of axiomatic design.” Research in Engineering Design 3 (3): 149–162.
  • Gharajedaghi, J. 1999/2006/2011. Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture, Second Edition, Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann
  • Ghosh, G. 2011. “What’s Your Cause”, Building Social Business weblog. www.gautamblogs.com/2011/05/whats-your-cause.html
  • Giachetti, R. E. 2010. Design of enterprise systems: theory, architecture, and methods. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Gilbert, T., (1996) Human Competence; Engineering Worthy Performance, HRD Press. Rev&Updtd edition.
  • Godsave, H., The Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) model of post-conflict intervention: progress in Afghanistan and future Prospects. MA Dissertation. Conflict, security and development programme. London: King’s College, 2007.
  • Goldkuhl, G., Lyytinen, K., A language action view of information systems, in Ginzberg, M., Ross, C.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on information systems, TIMS/SMIS/ACM, 1982
  • Gøtze, J., 2013, The Changing Role of the Enterprise Architect. Proceedings of the 2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW 2013), 9-13 September 2013, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Gould, D. P. (1986) “Stratified systems theory in the design of organization-wide information systems,” International Journal of Information Management, 6 (1), pp. 5−15.
  • Grant RM 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, Spring 1991, pp 114-135.
  • Graves, T.S. 2008. “The Viable Services Model: Service quality, service interdependence and service completeness”, in IT Service Management: Global Best Practices, J. van Bon (ed.), Zaltbommel, NL: Van Haren, pp.511-529.
  • Graves, T.S. 2009. Doing enterprise architecture: Process and practice in the real enterprise. Colchester, Tetradian Books
  • Graves, T.S. 2009. The Service Oriented Enterprise: enterprise architecture and viable services, Colchester, England: Tetradian.
  • Graves, T.S. 2010. Everyday Enterprise-Architecture: Sensemaking, Strategy, Structures and Solutions, Colchester, Tetradian Books.
  • Graves, T.S. 2010. Mapping The Enterprise: modelling the enterprise as services with the Enterprise Canvas, Colchester, England: Tetradian.
  • Graves, T.S. 2011. ‘More on ‘Not-quite VPEC-T’’, Tetradian weblog, weblog.tomgraves.org/index.php/2011/04/21/more-on-not-vpect/
  • Gravesen, Jan. Enterprise Architecture – Effektiv ressourceudnyttelse som en tværorganisatorisk kompetence. København: Børsen, 2010.
  • Green, N., and Bate, C. 2007. Lost In Translation: A handbook for information systems for the 21st century, New York, NY: Evolved Technologist Press.
  • Gunner, G, and Nordquist, K.-A. (2011), An Unlikely Dilemma – Constructing a partnership between human rights and peace building. Church of Sweden Research Series No 4
  • Hagan, Paula J. 2004. Guide to the (Evolving) Enterprise Architecture Body of Knowledge. VA:The MITRE Corporation.
  • Hall, A. D. 1989. Metasystems methodology: A new synthesis and unification. International series on systems science and engineering. 1st ed. Vol. 3. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
  • Hamel, G., 2007. The Future of Management, Harvard Business School Press.
  • Hammer, M., 1990. Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate. , Harvard Business Review no. 68.
  • Hammer, M., and J. Champy. 1993. Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York, NY: Harper Business.
  • Handy, C. 1992. Balancing corporate power: A new federalist paper. Harvard Business Review 70 (6) (November/December): 59-67.
  • Handy, C. 1995. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review (May-June): 2-8.
  • Harmon, P., 2007. Business Process Change. A Guide for Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • Harvey, David L. (2009) ‘Complexity and Case’, In Byrne, D. and Ragin, C. C. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, Oxford, England, Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Haskins, C. (ed.) (2007) INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook, a Guide for Life Cycle Processes and Activities (Version 3.1)
  • Henderson, J., Venkatramen, N. (1989) Strategic Alignment: A Model for Organisational Transformation, in Kochan, T., Unseem, M. (Eds.), 1992. Transforming Organisations. OUP, New York.
  • Herald, T., Berkemeyer, W. and Lawson, H. 2004. “A Knowledge Management System Life Cycle Description Using the ISO/IEC 15288 Standard” Proceedings of the INCOSE Conference, Toulouse, France.
  • Herring, C., and S. Kaplan. 2001. The Viable System Architecture.
  • Heylighen, Francis, and Cliff Joslyn. 2001. Cybernetics and Second-OrderCybernetics. In Encyclopedia of Physical Science & Technology, ed. R.A Meyers, 155-170. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press.
  • Hines, P. and N. Rich. 1997. The seven value stream mapping tools. Intl J of Ops & Prod Mgmt, Vol 17, No 1, 1997.
  • Hinssen, P. (2011) Business/IT Fusion. 2nd Ed.
  • Hitchins, D. 1993. Putting systems to work. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hock, D. (1999) Birth of the Chaordic Age, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Hoebeke, L. (1994). Making Work Systems Better: A Practitioner’s Reflections. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Højsgaard, Hjalte. 2011. “Market-Driven Enterprise Architecture.” Journal of Enterprise Architecture 7 (1) (February): 28-38.
  • Holwell S and Reynolds M (editors) 2010. Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A practitioner’s guide for the Open University, Springer, 2010.
  • Hoogervorst, J.A.P., 2009. Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering, Springer.
  • Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Enterprise Architecture: Enabling integration, Agility and Change, Journal of Cooperative InformationSystems, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2004, pp. 213-233
  • Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Quality and Customer Oriented Behavior. Towards a Coherent Approach for Improvement, Delft, Eburon 1998
  • Hoverstadt, P. 2008. The Fractal Organization : Creating Sustainable Organizations with the Viable Systems Model. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
  • INCOSE. 2010. INCOSE systems engineering handbook, version 3.2. San Diego, CA, USA: International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), INCOSE-TP-2003-002-03.2.
  • iPB, 2009. iPB Reference Manual (on-line documentation), IbisSoft, http://docs.ibissoft.se/node/3.
  • ISO 14001 2004. Environmental Management Systems — Requirements with Guidance for Use, International Standardization Organization, 1, rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.
  • ISO 9001 2008. Quality Management Systems, International Standardization Organization, 1, rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.
  • ISO. 2000. Industrial automation systems — requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 15704:2000.
  • ISO/IEC 15288 2002. Information technology – System life cycle processes, International Standardization Organization/International Electrotechnical Commission, 1, rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.
  • ISO/IEC 15288 2008. Systems and software engineering – System life cycle processes, International Standardization Organization/International Electrotechnical Commission, 1, rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.
  • ISO/IEC 42010 2011. Architecture description – International Standardization Organization, 1, rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.
  • ISO/IEC. 1998. Information technology — open distributed processing — reference model: Architecture. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), ISO/IEC 10746:1998.
  • ISO/IEC. 2007. Systems and software engineering — recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standards (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), ISO/IEC 42010:2007.
  • ISO/IEC. 2008. Systems and software engineering – system life cycle processes. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), ISO/IEC 15288:2008 (E).
  • ISO/IEC/IEEE 15939 Measurement Process, International Standardization Organization/International Electrotechnical Commission, 1, rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneve 20, Switzerland.
  • ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011 – Systems and software engineering – Architecture description
  • ISO15704:2000/Amd1:2005 Industrial automation systems – Requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies.
  • Ison, Ray (2010) Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World, Media, Springer, The Open University.
  • Iyamu, Tiko (2011) ‘Institutionalisation of the Enterprise Architecture’, International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation, 3(1), pp. 27-38.
  • Jackson, M. C., 2003. Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers, Wiley.
  • Jackson, M.C. 2000. Systems approaches to management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Jackson, M.C., Systems Thinking, Chichester, Wiley 2003
  • Jaques, E. (1986). “The development of intellectual capability: A discussion of stratified systems theory,” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22 (4), pp. 361–383.
  • Jaques, E. (1998). Requisite Organization: A Total System for Effective Managerial Organization and Managerial Leadership for the 21st Century, Revised second ed. Cason Hall & Co. Publishers, Baltimore, MD.
  • Jaques, E. and Cason, K. (1994). Human Capability: A Study of Individual Potential and Its Application, Cason Hall & Co Publishers Ltd, Falls Church, VA.
  • Jensen-Waud, A.Ø. & J. Gøtze (2012) A Systemic-Discursive Framework for Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 8 (3) pp 35-44.
  • Jensen, Anders Østergaard (2010) ‘Government Enterprise Architecture Adoption: A Systemic-Discursive Critique and Reconceptualisation’, Copenhagen Business School.
  • Joannou, P. 2007. Enterprise, systems, and software—the need for integration. Computer, IEEE, May 2007.
  • Jokisch, Rodrigo (2010) ‘Why Did Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory Find So Little Resonance in the United States of America?’, Addressing Modernity: Social Theory and U.S. Cultures, not publis, pp. 240-271.
  • Kalakota, R., Robinson, M., E-Business. Roadmap for Success, Reading MA, Addison-Wesley 1999
  • Kandjani, H. and Bernus, P. (2011). Engineering Self-Designing Enterprises as Complex Systems Using Extended Axiomatic Design Theory. IFAC Papers On Line , IFAC-WCC18(1). Amsterdam : Elsevier. pp11943-11948.
  • Kandjani, H., Bernus, P. (2013). The Enterprise Architecture Body of Knowledge as an Evolving Discipline. In Saha, P. (Ed) A Systemic Perspective to Managing Complexity with Enterprise Architecture. Hershey : IGI Global.
  • Kaplan, J. 2009. Strategic IT portfolio management: Governing enterprise transformation. Washington, DC: Jeffrey Kaplan PRTM.
  • Kaplan, R.S. Norton, D.P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., Strategy Maps, Boston, Harvard Business School Press 2004
  • Kaufman, R.S., Why Operations Improvement Programs fail: Four managerial Contradictions, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1992, pp. 83-93
  • Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2007). Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 129–162.
  • Khomyakov M., and Bider, I., 2000. “Achieving Workflow Flexibility through Taming the Chaos”. In. Patel D., Choudhury I., Patel S., de Cesare S. (Eds.) OOIS 2000 – 6th international conference on object oriented information systems, Springer, pp.85-92.
  • Kim, S. J., N.P. Suh, and S.K. Kim. 1991. “Design of Software Systems Based on Axiomatic Design.” Robotics & Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 8 (4): 243–255.
  • Kirby, J., Implementing CRM: Business Change Program, Not Project, Gartner Research, July 2001
  • Klang, M. & Nolin, J. To Inform or to Interact, that is the question: The role of Freedom of Information. Social Media Policies, Information Science and Social Media – International Conference, Åbo/Turku, Finland, 2011.
  • Knox, S., Maklan, S., Payne, A., Peppard, J., Ryals, L., Customer Relationship Management, Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann 2003
  • Koncern IT, Region Hovedstaden (2009) Ledelsesstrategi for Regionens sundheds-it.
  • Kondabolu, V., O. Oduntan, and N Park. 2010. An analysis of the effectiveness of supplier innovation as a competitive strategy for an enterprise under conditions of high-turbulence. In TIIM 2011 Conference Proceedings. Oulu, Finland
  • Korhonen, J.J., Hiekkanen, K. and Lähteenmäki, J. (2009). “EA and IT governance − a systemic approach,” in: Politis, J. (Ed.), 5th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance. Academic Publishing Limited, Reading, UK, pp. 66–74.
  • Kotter, J.P., 1995. Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review, (March – April 1995), p.9.
  • Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, Chicago University press 1970
  • Kunc MH, Morecroft JDW 2010. Managerial Decision-Making and Firm Performance Under a Resource-Based Paradigm, Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1164-1180, 2010.
  • Kuras, M. L., and B. E. White. 2005. Engineering enterprises using complex-systems engineering. Paper presented at 15th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, 10-15 July, 2010, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Kurtz, C.F. and Snowden, D.J. 2003. “The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world,” IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), pp. 462-483.
  • Lackenbauer, H. (2011). Reflections on civil-military cooperation in Afghanistan – Experiences from a political adviser 2009-2010. Swedish Defense Research Agency. FOI Memo 37093 (in Swedish).
  • Lakoff, G and Johnson, M 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Ill. ; London, University of Chicago Press
  • Lamb, J.: The Greening of IT: How Companies Can Make a Difference for the Environment, IBM Press/Pearson plc, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2009).
  • Langefors, B.: Information System Theory. Information Systems 2, 207–219 (1977)
  • Langenwalter, G.: ”Life” is Our Ultimate Customer: From Lean to Sustainability, Target Magazine, Volume 22 No. 1, Association for Manufacturing Excellence (2006); available at: www.zerowaste.org/publications/Lean_to_Sustainability.pdf.
  • Langley, Ann and Tsoukas, Haridimos (2010) ‘Introducing “ Perspectives on Process Organization Studies ”’, In Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (eds.), Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing, Oxford, England, OUP Oxford, pp. 1-26.
  • Lankhorst, Marc (2005) Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis [Hardcover], Berlin, Springer.
  • Latour, Bruno (1986) ‘“The Powers of Association”. Power, Action and Belief. A new sociology of knowledge’, 32nd ed. In Law, J. (ed.), Sociological Review Monograph, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 264-280.
  • Lawrence, Stewart and Botes, Vida (2011) ‘ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE : AN AUTOPOIETIC VIEW’, Journal of Global Business and Technology, 7(1), pp. 74-86.
  • Lawson, H. 2010. A Journey Through the Systems Landscape, College Publications, Kings College, UK.
  • Lawson, H., and Martin, J. N. 2008. “On the Use of Concepts and Principles for Improving Systems Engineering Practice.”, Proceedings of the INCOSE International Conference, Utrecht.
  • Leonard, Allenna (2009) ‘The Viable System Model and Its Application to Complex Organizations’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(4), pp. 223-233, [online] Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11213-009-9126-z (Accessed 2 September 2011).
  • Lewin, K. (1951) Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright (Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
  • Lind, M., Ostberg, O., & Johannisson, P., Acting Out the Swedish e-Government Action plan – Mind and Mend the Gaps. International Journal of Public Information System, Vol.2009:2, Pp. 37-60.
  • Lindland, Ivar (1994) ‘Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling’, IEEE Software, 11(2), pp. 42-49.
  • Lovins, A.: Profitable Solutions to Climate, Oil, and Proliferation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Springer (2010); available at: www.rmi.org/cms/Download.aspx?id=4953&file=2010-18_ProfitableSolutionsClimateOil.pdf&title=Profitable+Solutions+to+Climate%2c+Oil%2c+and+Proliferation.
  • Luftman, J., Brier, T. (1999) Achieving and Sustaining Business-IT Alignment. California Management Review, Fall, 1999, Vol.42(1), p.109.
  • Luftman, J.A., Papp, R. and Brier, T. (1999). Enablers and Inhibitors of Business–IT Alignment, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 1(Article 11), pp. 1–33.
  • Luhmann, Niklas (1995) Social systems, Stanford, Standford University Press, [online] Available from: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zVZQW4gxXk4C&pgis=1.
  • Lytle, W. O. 1996. Accelerating the design of high-performance organisations, MA: William O. Lytle & Associates
  • Machiavelli, N., The Prince. Chapter VI. Florence, 1532.
  • Madni, A. et al, (2001) IDEON™: An extensible ontology for designing, integrating, and managing collaborative distributed enterprises, Systems Engineering, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2001, Pages: 35-48.
  • Maeir, M., Emory, D., Hilliard, R. 2004. “ANSI/IEEE 1471 and Systems Engineering.” The Journal of The International Council on Systems Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 3.
  • Maes, R., 1999. A Generic Framework for Information Management. Prime Vera Working Paper, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Maes, R., Rijsenbrij, D., Truijens, O., Goedvolk, H., 2000. Redefining Business–IT Alignment Through A Unified Framework. Universiteit Van Amsterdam/Cap Gemini White Paper.
  • Maier, M.W. Emery, D. Hilliard, R., Software Architecture: Introducing IEEE Standard 1471, IEEE Computer, April 2001, Vol. 34-4, pp 107-109
  • Maier, M.W., Rechtin, E., The Art of Systems Architecting, Boca Raton, CRC Press 2002
  • Marcus, C., CRM Deployment Can Focus on Most Valued Customers, Gartner Research, July 2001
  • Maritan CA, Peteraf MA 2010. Building a bridge between resource acquisition and resource accumulation, Journal of Management 2010.
  • Martin, J. N. 1997. Systems engineering guidebook: A process for developing systems and products. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Martin, J. N. 2003. An integrated tool suite for the NOAA observing system architecture. Paper presented at 13th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Martin, J. N. 2003. On the use of knowledge modeling tools and techniques to characterize the NOAA observing system architecture. Paper presented at 13th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Martin, J. N. 2004. The seven samurai of systems engineering: Dealing with the complexity of 7 interrelated systems. Paper presented at 14th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, 20-24 June, 2004, Toulouse, France.
  • Martin, J. N. 2005. Using an enterprise architecture to assess the societal benefits of earth science research. Paper presented at 15th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Martin, J. N. 2006. An enterprise architecture process incorporating knowledge modeling methods. PhD., George Mason University.
  • Martin, J. N. 2010. An enterprise systems engineering framework. Paper presented at 20th Anniversary International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, 12-15 July, 2010, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Martin, J. N. 2012. Enterprise Systems Engineering Knowledge Area. Article in the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBOK). Published by the Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKASE). www.bkcase.org.
  • Mathews, J. (1995) Organizational foundations of intelligent manufacturing systems – the holonic viewpoint. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 8(4). pp237–243.
  • Maturana, Humberto R. and Varela, Francisco (1987) Tree of Knowledge, Boston, Massachusetts, Shambhala.
  • McCaughin, K., and J. K. DeRosa. 2006. Process in enterprise systems engineering. Paper presented at 16th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, 9-13 July, 2006, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • McChrystal, S. (2011) after 10 years, Afghan war only half done. The Guardian, 7 October 2011
  • McDavid, D. (1999) Discovering the User’s Ontology in a Living Enterprise, Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems Engineering, Las Vegas, NV.
  • McKeen, J.D. and Smith, H. (2003). Making IT Happen: Critical issues in IT management, Chichester, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • McKinsey & Company: Resource Revolution: Meeting the world’s energy, materials, food, and water needs (2012); available at: www.mckinsey.com/insights/energy_resources_materials/resource_revolution.
  • McKinsey & Company: Strategy Under Uncertainty, McKinsey Quarterly (2000); available at: www.mckinsey.com/insights/managing_in_uncertainty/strategy_under_uncertainty.
  • McMorland, J. (2005). “Are you big enough for your job? Is your job big enough for you? Exploring Levels of Work in organisations,” University of Auckland Business Review, 7 (2), pp. 75–83.
  • Mculloch W. (1965) Embodiments of Mind. MIT Press
  • Meadows, Donella: Thinking in Systems: A Primer, Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VT (2008).
  • Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame, California Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1984, pp. 128-145
  • Miller, J., and S. Page. 2007. Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Miller, James Grier (1978) Living Systems, McGraw Hill Higher Education.
  • Mingers, John (2002) ‘Can social systems be autopoietic ? Assessing Luhmann ’ s social theory’, Review Literature And Arts Of The Americas.
  • Mingers, John (2003) ‘Observing organizations: An evalaution of Luhmann’s organisation theory’, In Bakken, T. and Hernes, T. (eds.), Autopoietic Organisation Theory, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Business School Press.
  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, P.B. & Lampel, J.B., 2008. Strategy Safari: The Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management 2nd ed., Financial Times/ Prentice Hall.
  • Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J. and Ahlstrand, B. 1998. Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through The Wilds of Strategic Management. Free Press.
  • Mintzberg, H., The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York, The Free Press 1994
  • Mjøset, Lars (2009) The Contextualist Approach to Social Science Methodology, Byrne, D. and Ragin, C. C. (eds.), Social Science, Oxford, England, SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • MOD. 2004. Ministry of defence architecture framework (MODAF), version 2. UK: U.K. Ministry of Defence.
  • Morecroft JDW 1985. Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models, Management Science, 31(7), 1985, pp 900-916.
  • Morecroft JDW 2002. Resource management under dynamic complexity, in A Systems View of Resources, Capabilities and Management Processes (Morecroft, Heene and Sanchez editors), Elsevier Pergamon, Oxford, 2002.
  • Morecroft JDW 2007. Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems View, Wiley 2007.
  • Morecroft, John (2010) ‘System Dynamics’, In Reynolds, M. and Holwell, S. (eds.), Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practicle Guuide, London, Springer, The Open University, pp. 25-86.
  • Morgan, G. 1997. Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, Calif., London, Sage
  • Morgan, Gareth (1996) Images of Organization, Sage Publications, Inc, [online] Available from: citeulike-article-id:3955293.
  • Mosakowski E, McKelvey W 1997. Predicting rent generation in competence-based competition, chapter 3, 65-85, in Competence-Based Strategic Management (Heene and Sanchez editors), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 1997.
  • Müller, Karl H (2010) ‘The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations’, Constructivist Foundations, 6(1).
  • Mumford, E. 1996. “Risky Ideas in the Risk Society,” Journal of Information Technology 11(4).
  • Mumford, E. 2006. “The story of socio-technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential,” Information Systems Journal, 16, pp. 317–342
  • Murray, R., (2011) A New Situation for the Foreign Service. Stockholm: The Government Expert Group on Public Economics, ESO 2011:1
  • Nadler, D.A., Tushman, M.L., Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture, New York, Oxford University Press 1997
  • Nagel, E., The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Londen, Routledge & Kegan Paul 1961
  • NATO. 2004. NATO architecture framework (NAF), version 2. Brussels, Belgium: North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
  • Nechansky, Helmut (2010) ‘The Relationship Between : Miller ’ s Living Systems Theory and Beer ’ s Viable Systems Theory’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 112(December 2008), pp. 97-113.
  • Nielsen-Gammon, J.: Texas Drought and Global Warming (2011); available at: blog.chron.com/climateabyss/2011/09/texas-drought-and-global-warming/.
  • Nielsen, Tomas Hannibal, and Jean Krogh. IT Håndbogen Enterprise Arkitektur. København: Børsens Ledelseshåndbøger, 2010.
  • Nightingale, D., and D. Rhodes. 2004. Enterprise systems architecting: Emerging art and science within engineering systems. Paper presented at Engineering Systems Symposium, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 29-31 March, 2004, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Nightingale, D., and J. Srinivasan. 2011. Lean enterprise thinking: Driving enterprise transformation. New York, NY: AMACOM Press.
  • Nightingale, D., and R. Valerdi. 2011. Journal of enterprise transformation. Taylor and Francis.
  • Nolte, Heike (2011) ‘Reflective Organization’, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 17(c), pp. 77-91.
  • Noran, O. 2003. A mapping of individual architecture frameworks (GRAI, Pera, C4ISR, CIMOSA, Zachman, ARIS) onto GERAM. In Handbook of Enterprise Architecture, ed. P. Bernus, 65–210. Springer Verlag, West Berlin, Germany
  • Norheim-Martinsen, P. M., EU capabilities for a Comprehensive Approach: Broad Interoperability as a Comparative Advantage. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, FFI-rapport 2009/01300.
  • Novak, J., (1998) Learning, Creating and Using Knowledge, Earlbaum, pg 90.
  • O’Dwyer, G. (2013) Sweden’s Military Spending To Rise? DefenseNews, Feb. 1, 2013.
  • Oakland, J.S., Porter, L.J., Cases in Total Quality Management, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann 1994
  • Oduntan O. and Park, N. EVAT: A Platform for Enterprise Viability Analysis and Prediction, 2009 INFORMS annual meeting, San Diego, Oct. 11-14, 2009
  • Oduntan, O. 2008. A systematic Approach for the Design of Viable Enterprises Under Conditions of Business Turbulence. PhD. Dissertation, Wayne State University.
  • Oduntan, O., and Park, N. 2012. Enterprise Viability Model: Extending Enterprise Architecture Frameworks for Modeling and Analyzing Viability under Turbulence, IIE Journal of Enterprise Transformation, Vol.2 , Issue 1, 2012, pp 1-25
  • Okino, N. (1992) A Prototyping of Bionic Manufacturing System. In Norrie, D.H. (Ed), Proc. Int Conf on Object-Oriented Manufacturing Systems. Div. Mfg. Sys. Alberta : U Calgary. pp297-302.
  • Östberg, O., Swedish e-gov 2010 – Where is it coming from and where is it going. International Journal of Public Information Systems, Vol. 2010:2, Pp.149-169.
  • Osterwalder, A., and Pigneur, Y. 2009. Business Model Generation, Self-published.
  • Owens, C.: Fostering Business Resilience (2004), available at: www.interisle.net/sub/Business_Resilience.pdf.
  • Park, N., and Oduntan, O. 2009. An Operational Ecology Model for Enhancing the Sustainability of the US Health Care Industry, 2009 INFORMS annual meeting, San Diego, Oct. 11-14, 2009
  • Park, N., and Oduntan, O. 2010. Distributed Innovation as an Enabler of Long-Term Customer Satisfaction and Sustained Competitiveness under Turbulence. In TIIM 2010 Conference Proceedings. Pattaya, Thailand.
  • Park, N., Oduntan, O., and Mejabi, O. 2007. An operational ecology model for viability in a complex business ecosystem. In INFORMS Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, Nov. 2007.
  • Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Parsons, T. 1967. Structure of Social Action: 001, New York, Free Press.
  • Partridge, Chris (2005) Business Objects: Re-engineering for Re-use, The BORO Centre
  • Pepper, S. 1961. World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. CA:University of California Press.
  • Peters, M. 1984 ‘The Origins and Status of Action Research’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(2), pp. 113-124, [online] Available from: http://jab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/002188638402000203
  • Peterson, R. 2004. “Crafting Information Technology Governance,” EDPACS: The EDP Audit, Control & Security Newsletter, 32 (6), pp. 1–24.
  • Pettigrew, A., Success and Failure in Corporate Transformation Initiatives, In: Galliers, R.D., Baets, W.R.J., Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Chichester, Wiley 1998
  • Pisselo, T., Strassmann, P., IT Value Chain Management – Maximizing the Value from IT Investments, New Canaan, The Information Economics Press 2003
  • Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchington & Co.
  • Porter ME 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic Management Review, 12, 1991, pp 95-117.
  • Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
  • Potts, C., 2008. fruITion: Creating the Ultimate Corporate Strategy for Information Technology illustrated edition., Technics Publications, LLC.
  • Potts, Chris. “Enterprise Architecture Driving Business Innovation – Time to Break Out of IT.” GEAO Journal of Enterprise Architecture Extract, no. 3 (1) (Marts 2008).
  • Potts, Chris. “Using Structural Performance Ratios to Guide Investments in Enterprise Architecture.” a|EA journal, November 2010A: 14-18.
  • Potts, Chris. RecrEAtion. Bradley Beach: Technics Publications, 2010B.
  • PWC (2005) 9th annual Global CEO Survey
  • Pyster, A. and D.H. Olwell (eds). 2013. The Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), v. 1.1.1. Hoboken, NJ: The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology.
  • Ragin, Charles C. (2007) ‘Comparative Methods’, In Outhwaite, W. and Turner, S. P. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Methodology, London, Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Reason, Peter and Bradbury, Hilary (2008) The SAGE Handbook of Action Research, 2nd ed. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.), London, Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Rebovich, G. 2006. Systems thinking for the enterprise: New & emerging perspectives. Paper presented at IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, April 2006, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Rebovich, G., and B. E. White, eds. 2010. Enterprise systems engineering: Advances in the theory and practice. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Rechtin, E. Systems Architecting of Organizations, Boca Raton, CRC Press 2000
  • Rechtin, E., Maier, M.: The Art of Systems Architecting, Second Edition, CRC Press, p. 234 (1997).
  • Region Hovedstaden (2007) Koncern IT’s Værdier.
  • Regionernes Sundheds-it Organisation (2010) En fælles regional samarbejdsmodel på sundheds-it området.
  • Regionernes Sundheds-it Organisation, website: http://www.regioner.dk/sundhed/sundheds-it/rsi/organisering
  • Reich, B. and I. Benbasat (2000). “Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives.” MIS quarterly 24(1): 81-113.
  • Repenning NP, Henderson RM 2011, Making the numbers? “Short-termism” and the puzzle of only occasional disaster, forthcoming in Management Science.
  • Reynolds, Martin and Holwell, Sue (2010) Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide, London, Springer, The Open University.
  • Ribeiro, J.: Thailand Floods Hit Hard Drive Production, Macworld website (2011); available at: www.macworld.com.au/news/thailand-floods-hit-hard-drive-production-39511/.
  • Rigby, D., and P. Rogers. 2000. Winning in turbulence-strategies for success in turbulent times European Business Journal. UK.
  • Rigshospitalet (2008) Rigshospitalets it-strategi 2008 – 2010, Region Hovedstaden
  • Rinde, S. ‘Here’s 30 megs. Now go run Germany.’ http://30megs.com
  • Ring, J. 2000a. The Chaordic Form of Collaborative Commerce, Presentation to Delphi Group Summit, San Diego, CA.
  • Ring, J. 2000b. Effective Control in Peopled Systems, INCOSE Proceedings of International Symposium 2000.
  • Ring, J. 2001a. Systems Engineering the Agile enterprise, Tutorial conducted at International Council on Systems Engineering Symposium, Melbourne, AUS, 2001. CD available from author.
  • Ring, J. 2001b. The Next Venue for Systems Engineering, INCOSE Proceedings of International Symposium 2001, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Ring, J. 2001c. Discovering the Architecture of Product X, INCOSE Proceedings of International Symposium 2001, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Ring, J. 2002. E-Business Infrastructure Capability Assessment, INCOSE Proceedings of International Symposium 2002, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
  • Ring, J. 2004. Intelligent enterprises. INSIGHT, A Publication of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) 6 (2) (January 2004).
  • Ring, J. 2004. Seeing an enterprise as a system. INSIGHT, A Publication of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) 6 (2) (January 2004).
  • Ring, J. 2004. Xtreme Project Management; Another 12-step Process? International Conference on Systems Engineering, ICSE04 Conference Proceedings, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
  • Ring, J. 2004b. Factors Influencing SE Practices by 2010, INCOSE Proceedings of International Symposium 2004. Toulouse, FR.
  • RMI, Rocky Mountain Institute: Factor Ten Engineering Design Principles (2010); available at: www.rmi.org/10xE+Principles.
  • Roberts, J. L. 2006. Enterprise analysis and assessment. Paper presented at 16th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, 9-13 July, 2006, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Roedler, G., Rhodes, D., Jones, C., Schimmoller, H. 2010. Systems Engineering Leading Indicators Guide, Version 2.0, INCOSE-TP-2005-001-03. International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), San Diego, CA.
  • Romme, G. (1996). “Making Organizational Learning Work: Consent and Double Linking between Circles,” European Management Journal, 14 (1), pp. 69–75.
  • Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006).
  • Ross, W. D. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Vol. VIII. XIV vols. 1953.
  • Rouse, W. (2005) Enterprises as systems: Essential challenges and approaches to transformation, Systems Engineering, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages: 138-150.
  • Rouse, W. B. 2005. A theory of enterprise information. Systems Engineering, the Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) 8 (4): 279-95.
  • Rouse, W. B. 2005. Enterprise as systems: Essential challenges and enterprise transformation. Systems Engineering, the Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) 8 (2): 138-50.
  • Rouse, W. B. 2006. Agile information systems for agile decision making. In Agile information systems., ed. K. C. Desouza. Woburn, MA, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Rouse, W. B. 2006. Enterprise transformation: Understanding and enabling fundamental change. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Rouse, W. B. 2008. Health care as a complex adaptive system: Implications for design and management. The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering 38 (1) (Spring 2008): 17-25.
  • Rouse, W. B. 2009. Engineering the enterprise as a system. In Handbook of systems engineering and management., eds. A. P. Sage, W. B. Rouse. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Rowbottom, R. and Billis, D. (1987). Organisational Design: The Work-Levels Approach. Gower, Aldershot, UK.
  • Royal Dutch Shell: Shell Energy Scenarios to 2050 (2008); available at: s01.static-shell.com/content/dam/shell/static/investor/downloads/ presentations/2008/bentham-csfb-june2008.pdf.
  • Rummler, G., Brache, A.: Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, pp.10, 82 (1995).
  • Runge, P., The Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan: Role model for civil-military relations? Bonn: International Center For Conversion, Occasional Paper IV, 2009.
  • Sage, A. P. 2000. Transdisciplinarity perspectives in systems engineering and management. In Transdisciplinarity: Recreating integrated knowledge., eds. M. A. Somerville, D. Rappaport, 158-169. Oxford, UK: EOLSS Publishers.
  • Sage, A. P., and W. B. Rouse, eds. 2009. Handbook of system engineering and management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sage, A., and C. Cuppan. 2001. On the systems engineering and management of systems of systems and federations of systems. Information-Knowledge-Systems Management Journal 2 (4) (December 2001): 325-45.
  • Saha, Pallab (2010) Advancing the Whole‐of‐Government Enterprise Architecture Adoption with Strategic (Systems) Thinking. NUS – Government Enterprise Architecture Research Project Report.
  • Sammenhængende digital sundhed i Danmark (2008) National strategi for digitalisering af sundhedsvæsenet 2008 – 2012, Danske Regioner.
  • Sauer and Yetton (1997) (eds.) Steps to the Future: Fresh thinking on the management of IT-based organizational transformation, 1st edn, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–21.
  • SBSA Partners: Improving Business Sustainability, pp.15-16 (2010); available at: www.sbsapartners.com/SBSA/ideas/Improving-Business-Sustainability-4dnld.pdf.
  • Schwaninger, Markus (2004) ‘What can cybernetics contribute to the conscious evolution of organizations and society?’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(5), pp. 515-527, [online] Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/sres.636.
  • Schwaninger, Markus (2006) ‘ResearchArticle Theories of Viability : a Comparison’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 347, pp. 337-348.
  • Scott Morton, M.S., The Corporation of the 1990s, New York, Oxford University Press 1991
  • Seidl, David and Becke, Kai Helge (2005) Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Business School Press.
  • Senge, P.M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization, Currency Doubleday, New York.
  • Senge, P.M., Klieiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R.B., and Smith, B.J. 1994. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization, Currency Doubleday, New York.
  • Sessions, Roger (2008) Simple Architectures For Complex Enterprises, Washington, Microsoft Press.
  • Shaw, D, Ackermann, F and Eden, C (2003) ‘Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(9), pp. 936-948, [online] Available from: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/doifinder/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601581 (Accessed 5 August 2010).
  • Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., and Layer, J.K.., 2007 “A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes”. International Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 37, 445-460.
  • Sherwood, J., Clark, A., Lynas, D.: Enterprise Security Architecture White Paper (2009); available at: www.sabsa-institute.com/members/sites/ default/inline-files/SABSA_White_Paper.pdf.
  • Shewhart, W. A. 1939. Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. New York: Dover.
  • Sillitto, H. 2012. Enabling Systems Engineering in the Organization Knowledge Area. Article in the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBOK). Published by the Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKASE). www.bkcase.org.
  • Smith, H., Fingar, P., Business Process Management: The Third Wave, Tampa Fl., Meghan-Kiffer Press 2003
  • SOU (2011) A World-class Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Stockholm: Government Central Offices, SOU 2011:21
  • Spewak, S. H. 1992. Enterprise architecture planning: Developing a blueprint for data, applications and technology. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Srinivasan, J. 2010. Towards a theory sensitive approach to planning enterprise transformation. Paper presented at 5th European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management (EIASM) Workshop on Organizational Change and Development, September 23-24, 2010, Vienna, Austria.
  • Starkermann, R., (2003) Amity and Enmity Editions a la Carte’ Zurich, ISBN 3-908730-29-5.
  • Stelzer, Dirk. 2009. Enterprise Architecture Principles: Literature Review and Research Directions. In ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009, LNCS 6275, 12-21. November 23.
  • Stephens, John and Haslett, Tim (2011) ‘A Set of Conventions, a Model: An Application of Stafford Beer’s Viable Systems Model to the Strategic Planning Process’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(5), pp. 429-452, [online] Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11213-011-9194-8 (Accessed 6 October 2011).
  • Sterman JD 1989. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decisionmaking, Management Science, 35 (3), 1989, pp 321-339.
  • Sterman JD 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2000.
  • Sterman, J.: Sustaining Sustainability: Creating a Systems Science in a Fragmented Academy and Polarized World; available at: jsterman.scripts.mit.edu/docs/Sterman%20Sustaining%20Sustainability%206-19.pdf.
  • Strategy Page (2011) Afghanistan and the impossible scheme, Murphy’s Law Article Index June 7, 2011. (http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htmurph/articles/20110607.aspx)
  • Suh N.P. 1998. “Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems.” Research in Engineering Design 10 (4): 189–209.
  • Suh, N.P. 1984. “Development of the science base for the manufacturing field through the axiomatic approach.” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 1 (3/4): 397–415.
  • Suh, N.P. 1997. “Design of systems.” ANNALS-CIRP 46: 75–80.
  • Suh, N.P., A.C. Bell, and D.C. Gossard. 1978. “On an axiomatic approach to manufacturing and manufacturing systems.” Journal of Engineering for Industry 100 (2): 127–130.
  • Suh, N.P., D.S. Cochran, and P.C. Lima. 1998. “Manufacturing System Design.” ANNALS-CIRP 47: 627–640.
  • Svensson, S., Lessons Still to be Learned – Interoperability Between Swedish Authorities in Northern Afghanistan. Bachelor Thesis, Global Development Studies, School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, 2011.
  • Swedish National Audit Office (2004) Who is in charge of the electronic administration? (In Swedish) Stockholm: Swedish National Audit Office, RiR 2004:19.
  • Swedish National Audit Office (2011) Swedish Contributions to International Efforts. (In Swedish) Stockholm: Swedish National Audit Office, RiR 2011:14.
  • Tallon, P. P., & Kraemer, K. L. (2003). Investigating the relationship between strategic alignment and IT business value: the discovery of a paradox. (N. Shin, Ed.)Business, 12, 1–22.
  • Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463–486.
  • Tamm, Thomas, Peter B Seddon, Graeme Shanks, and Peter Reynolds. “How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations?” Communication of the Association for Information Systems, marts 2011: 141-168.
  • Tapscott, D., Caston, A., Paradigm Shift – The New Promise of Information Technology, New York, McGraw-Hill 1993
  • Taylor, J. C. and Felten, D. F. 1993. Performance by Design: socio-technical systems in North America. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
  • Teece D, Pisano G 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 1994, pp 537-556.
  • Tham, M. Lindell, M., and Hull Wiklund, C. (2011), Chasing Synergies: Civil-Military Relations in PRT Mazar-e Sharif, FOI-R–3356–SE (in Swedish, English summary).
  • Tharumarajah A., Wells A.J., Nemes, L. 1996. A Comparison of the Bionic, Fractal and Holonic Manufacturing Concepts, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 9(3): 217-226.
  • Thatcher, M. E., & Pingry, D. E. (2007). Modeling the IT value paradox. Communications of the ACM, 50(8), 41–45.
  • The Centre for Army Lessons Learned (2011) Afghanistan Provincial Reconstruction Team Handbook 11-16. U.S. Army Combined Arms Center, Feb. 2011
  • The Open Group and SABSA Institute: TOGAF® and SABSA Integration: How SABSA and TOGAF complement each other to create better architectures (2011); available at: www.opengroup.org/bookstore/catalog/w117.htm.
  • Thomas, Oliver and Fellmann M.A., Michael (2009) ‘Semantic Process Modeling – Design and Implementation of an Ontology-based Representation of Business Processes’, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(6), pp. 438-451, [online] Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s12599-009-0078-8 (Accessed 10 August 2011).
  • TOGAF 9 (2009). The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), Version 9. The Open Group.
  • Trewn, J., and K. Yang. 2000. A treatise on system reliability and design complexity. In Proceedings of ICAD2000, First International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Cambridge, MA, 162–168.
  • Trist, E. 1981. The evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and an action research program, Ontario Quality of Working Life Center, Ontario Ministry of Labour.
  • Trist, E. L. and Bamforth, K. W. 1951. “Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting.” Human Relations, (4:1), pp 3-38.
  • Tuckman, B. 1965. Referenced in Wikipedia article, ‘Tuckman’s stages of group development’, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forming-storming-norming-performing (accessed 30 May 2011).
  • Tung, R. 1979. “Dimensions of Organizational Environments: An Exploratory Study of Their Impact on Organization Structure.” Academy of Management Journal 22 (4): 672-693.
  • Turner, Patrick. “Presentation on Next-Gen EA.” Idre Fjäll Enterprise Architecture Student Conference. Idre Fjäll, 3 August 2010.
  • Ullman, D., (2001) 12 Steps to Robust Decisions, Trafford Publishing, Victoria, BC.
  • USA, A Framework for Improving Enterprise Architecture Management, Version 1.1, US General Accounting Office, Washington D.C., April 2003
  • Valerdi, R., D. Nightingale, and C. Blackburn. 2009. Enterprises as systems: Context, boundaries, and practical implications. Information-Knowledge-Systems Management Journal 7 (4) (December 2008): 377-99.
  • van der Aalst, W.M.P., Kiepuszewski, B, Barros, A P and Dogac, Asuman (2003) ‘Workflow Patterns’, Distributed and Parallel Databases, pp. 5-51.
  • van der Heijden, K.: Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England (2005).
  • van Eijnatten, F. 1993. The Paradigm that Changed the Workplace. Assen, van Gorcum.
  • Vernadat, F. B. 1996. Enterprise modelling and integration – principles and applications. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
  • von Bertalanffy, L. 1968. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. Revised ed. New York, nY: Braziller.
  • Wagter, Roel, Martin van den Berg, Joost Luijpers, and Marlies van Steenbergen. Dynamic Enterprise Architecture. John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
  • Wand, Y and Weber, R (1990) ‘An Ontological Model of an Information System’, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Computer Society, 16, pp. 1282-1292.
  • Wang, W., Yu W., Li, Q., Wang W., and Liu, X. Service-Oriented High Level Architecture, European Simulation Interoperability Workshop. Edinburgh, Scotland: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. 08E-SIW-022. 2008
  • Ward, M. (2010),The Future of PRTs. A speech available at https://www.cimicweb.org/Documents/ PRT%20CONFERENCE%202010/The%20Future%20of%20PRTs%20new.pdf
  • Warfield, J. (2006) Introduction to Systems Science, World Scientific Press, 2006.
  • Warnecke, H. J. (1993) The Fractal Company. Heidelberg : Springer
  • Warren KD 2002. Competitive Strategy Dynamics. Wiley 2002.
  • Warren KD 2008. Strategic Management Dynamics, Wiley 2008.
  • Wasson, C. S. 2006. System analysis, design and development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Watson, B. P. (2007). Is Strategic Alignment Still a Priority? CIO Insight, (86), 36–39.
  • Weaver, W. 1948. “Science and Complexity.” American Science, 36 pp 536-544.
  • WEF, World Economic Forum: Global Risks, Sixth Edition (2011); available at: reports.weforum.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/mp/ uploads/pages/files/global-risks-2011.pdf.
  • Wegmann, Alain, Gil Regev, Irina Rychkova, Lam-Son Lê, José Diego De La Cruz, and Philippe Julia. “Business and IT Alignment with SEAM for Enterprise Architecture.” The 11th IEEE International EDOC Conference. Annapolis: EDOC, 2007.
  • Wegmann, Alain. “On The Systemic Enterprise Architecture Methodology.” International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. Angers: EPFL/LAMS & ICEIS, 2003.
  • Weick, K. E. 2001. Making Sense of the Organization. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
  • Weick, K.E., 2000. Making Sense of the Organization, Wiley Blackwell.
  • Weill, P. & Ross, J., 2009. IT Savvy: What Top Executives Must Know to Go from Pain to Gain, Harvard Business School Press.
  • Weill, P. & Ross, J.W., 2004. IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results, Harvard Business School Press.
  • Weill, P. 1998. Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology, Harvard Business Review Press
  • Weill, P. and Ross, J. 2005. “A Matrixed Approach to Designing IT Governance,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 46 (2), pp. 26–34.
  • Weinberg, G., (2001) An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, Dorset House, Reprinted 2001.
  • Weinberg, G., and D. Weinberg. 1988. General principles of systems design. New York, NY: Dorset House Publishing Company.
  • Weinberg, G.M., An introduction to General Systems Thinking, New York, Dorset House Publishing 2001
  • Weiss, J.W. and D. Anderson (2004) Aligning Technology and Business Strategy: Issues & Frameworks, A Field Study of 15 Companies. Proceedings 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Wenger, E., 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity New Ed., Cambridge University Press.
  • Wernerfelt B 1984. A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 1984, pp 171-180.
  • Weske, M., 2010. Business Process Management. Concepts, Languages, Architecture, Springer.
  • White, B. E. 2006. Enterprise opportunity and risk. Paper presented at 16th Annual International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) International Symposium, 9-13 July, 2010, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • White, B. E. 2007. On interpreting scale (or view) and emergence in complex systems engineering. Paper presented at 1st Annual IEEE Systems Conference, 9-12 April, 2007, Honolulu, HI, USA.
  • White, B. E. 2008. Complex adaptive systems engineering (CASE). Paper presented at Understanding Complex Systems Symposium, 12-15 May 2008, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
  • White, B. E., and B. G. McCarter. 2009. Emergence of SoS, sociocognitive aspects. In Systems of systems engineering: Principles and applications., ed. M. Jamshidi, 71-105. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Wholey, D.R., and J. Brittain. 1989. “Characterizing environmental variation.” Academy of Management Journal 32 (4): 867–882.
  • Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics, or Communication and Control in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Wikipedia. TRAK Architecture Framework [article]. in Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. [database online]. San Francisco, CA, USA, 2010Available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRAK (accessed 2010).
  • Williams, T.J., Bernus, P., Brosvic, J., Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., Nemes, L., Nevins, J.L., Vallespir, B., Vlietstra, J., Zoetekouw, D. (1994) Architectures for Integrating Manufacturing Activities and Enterprises. Computers in Industry 24 (2-3), Special Issue on CIM. pp111-140.
  • Winograd, T, F. Flores, 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Ablex, Norwood NJ.
  • Woolridge, L., Hayden, F., How to get value from mergers, acquisitions and divestments, CSC Research Journal, November 2002
  • Wymore, A. W. (1998) Subsystem Optimization Implies System Suboptimization: Not! at http://www.sie.arizona.edu/sysengr/wymore/optimal.html.
  • Wymore, A. W., (1993) Model-based Systems Engineering, CRC Press
  • Yergin, Daniel (1993) The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, & Power, Free Press.
  • Zachman, J. A. “A framework for information systems architecture.” IBM Systems Journal, 1987: 276-292.
  • Zachman, J. A. 1987. “A framework for information systems architecture,” IBM Systems Journal, (26:3), pp 276-292.
  • Zachman, J. A. 1992. Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 31 (3): 590-616.
  • Zachman, J. A. 1997. Concepts of the Framework for Enterprise Architecture, Zachman International Inc
  • Zachman, J. A. 2003. The Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture: Primer for Enterprise Engineering and Manufacturing, Zachman International. E-book: www.businessrulesgroup.org/BRWG_RFI/ZachmanBookRFIextract.pdf
  • Zachman, J. A. 2008. The Zachman Framework™: A Concise Definition, Zachman International.
  • ZWA, Zero Waste Alliance: Publications and Case Studies (2011); available at: www.zerowaste.org/publications.htm.