Enterprise Architecture (EA) is created, maintained, and managed through EA processes. While the quality of these processes is perceived to ultimately impact the realization of benefits from the EA approach, it has been considered in relatively few studies. Specific aspects of EA processes such as EA frameworks have been extensively studied, but there is no common understanding of the attributes that make up EA processes of high quality. In this exploratory case study, data from 14 themed interviews of EA stakeholders is utilized to identify 15 quality attributes for EA processes. These are then supplemented and validated by comparison to the hitherto existing state of research. The results provide a comprehensive framework for understanding EA process quality. They can be used to identify areas for development and define metrics for further improvement of the EA practice, and as a basis for further research.
Enterprise Architecture, Quality, Process, Planning, Governance, Documentation, Management
The author wishes to thank the Finnish Cultural Foundation, Central Finland Regional fund, and Oskar Öflund’s Foundation for funding this research, and Professor Samuli Pekkola for his valuable advice.
About the author
Eetu Niemi is an EA and information security consultant working especially in the finance industry and the public sector. He supports large-scale organizational transformation initiatives by the design and utilization of business-oriented functional architecture blueprints. He is also a doctoral student finalizing a thesis on the EA benefit realization process. He holds an MSc in Economics.
S. Aier, B. Gleichauf, R. Winter: Understanding Enterprise Architecture Management Design – An Empirical Analysis, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp.645-654 (2011).
R. Foorthuis, M. van Steenbergen, N. Mushkudiani, W. Bruls, S. Brinkkemper, R. Bos: On Course, but not there yet: Enterprise Architecture Conformance and Benefits in Systems Development, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Information Systems, 21 pages (2010).
N. Hämäläinen, T. Kärkkäinen: A Goal-Oriented Way to Define Metrics for an Enterprise Architecture Program, Journal of Enterprise Architecture (4:1), pp.20-26 (2008).
ISO 9000:2005: Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary, Geneva: ISO.
ISO/IEC 9126:2001: Software Engineering – Product Quality, Geneva: ISO/IEC.
S. Jovchelovitch, M.W. Bauer: Narrative Interviewing, in Qualitative Researching with Text, Image, and Sound, M.W. Bauer & G.D. Gaskell (Eds.), London: Sage Publications, pp.57-74 (2000).
J.M. Juran, A.B Godfrey: Juran’s Quality Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill (2000).
R. Lagerström, T. Sommestad, M. Buschle, M. Ekstedt: Enterprise Architecture Management’s Impact on Information Technology Auccess, Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 10 pages (2011).
M. Lange: Evaluating the Realization of Benefits from Enterprise Architecture Management: Construction and Validation of a Theoretical Model, Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2012).
N. Lim, T. Lee, S. Park: A Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Based on EA Quality Attributes, Proceedings of the 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, pp.283-288 (2009).
E. Niemi: Enterprise Architecture Stakeholders – A Holistic View, Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 8 pages (2007).
E. Niemi, S. Pekkola: Adapting the DeLone and McLean Model for the Enterprise Architecture Benefit Realization Process, Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 10 pages (2009).
G. Paré: Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems (13:1), pp.233-264 (2004).
L.F. Pitt, R.T. Watson, C.B. Kavan: Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness, MIS Quarterly (19:2), pp.173-187 (1995).
M. Pulkkinen: Systemic Management of Architectural Decisions in Enterprise Architecture Planning: Four Dimensions and Three Abstraction Levels, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 9 pages (2006).
B. van der Raadt, H. van Vliet: Designing the Enterprise Architecture Function, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, pp.103-118 (2008).
A. Rai, H. Al-Hindi: The Effects of Development Process Modeling and Task Uncertainty on Development Quality Performance, Information & Management (37:6), pp.335-346 (2000).
M. Schӧenherr: Towards a Common Terminology in the Discipline of Enterprise Architecture, Proceedings of the ICSOC 2008 International Workshop, pp.400-413 (2009).
T. Tamm, P.B. Seddon, G. Shanks, P. Reynolds: Delivering Business Value Through Enterprise Architecture, Journal of Enterprise Architecture (7:2), pp.17-30 (2011a).
T. Tamm, P.B. Seddon, G. Shanks, P. Reynolds: How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organizations?, Communications of the Association for Information Systems (28:1), pp.141-168 (2011b).
C. Urquhart, H. Lehmann, M.D. Myers: Putting the ‘Theory’ back into GroundedTtheory: Guidelines for Grounded Theory Studies in Information Systems, Information Systems Journal (20:4), pp.357-381 (2010).
R.K. Yin: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications (2009).
T. Ylimäki: Potential Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Architecture, Journal of Enterprise Architecture (2:4), pp.29-40 (2006).
T. Ylimäki: Towards a Generic Evaluation Model for Enterprise Architecture, Journal of Enterprise Architecture (3:3), pp.9-16 (2007).
Journal of Enterprise Architecture