Janne J. Korhonen and Jouko Poutanen
[groups_member group=”Premium”] [/groups_member]Abstract
The discipline of Enterprise Architecture (EA) is still relatively immature and incoherent. The discourse is rather fragmented and lacking a shared vocabulary. To shed some light on the situation, some schools of thought on EA have been suggested, each with its distinct concerns and set of assumptions. In this article, we aim to bring more structure and clarity to EA discourse. Not only do we review the identified types and schools of EA, but we also attempt to make sense of the underlying structural and metaphysical underpinnings of the field and to ground EA in theory. As per our analysis, requisite architecture methods and tools are contingent on the level of complexity. In particular, while best practices and linear techniques are applicable in a contained operational scope, they fall severely short in addressing complex problems pertaining to non-linear discontinuities inherent in the increasingly interconnected and global business environment. On the other hand, we view that an ideal scope of an architecture “work system” is bounded by a maximum number of people able to create a shared meaning. Accordingly, we propose that architectural work in an enterprise be divided into three distinct yet interlinked architectures: Technical, Socio-Technical, and Ecosystemic. Each of these architectures is selfregulated, based on different ontological and epistemological assumptions, has its own vertical scope, and requires its own distinct methods and tools.
Keywords
Enterprise Architecture, Schools of Thought, Requisite Organization, Work System, Ontology, Epistemology
About the authors
Janne J. Korhonen (janne.korhonen@aalto.fi) is pursuing a PhD at Aalto University on organizational governance of IT-related aspect systems (e.g., EA, information security, data, business process management). He received his MSc degree in Computer Science at Helsinki University of Technology and BA degree in Cognitive Science at University of Helsinki.
Jouko Poutanen (jouko.poutanen@fi.ibm.com) is a PhD student at the University of Jyväskylä and holds an MBA from Warwick Business School and BSc in Information Technology. Jouko works as a Country Technical Leader and IT Architect in IBM Finland. Jouko’s research focuses on adapting complexity theory to strategic management, organization design, and EA.
References
S. Bean: Re-thinking Enterprise Architecture Using Systems and Complexity Approaches, Journal of Enterprise Architecture, November 2010, pp.7-13 (2010).
B.A. Bechky: Sharing Meaning across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor, Organization Science (14:3), pp.312-330 (2003).
S.A. Bernard: Introduction to Enterprise Architecture, 2nd Edition, AuthorHouse (2005).
J. Boardman, B. Sauser: System of Systems – The Meaning of of, 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, pp.118-123 (2006).
P.R. Carlile: Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries, Organization Science (15:5), pp.555-568 (2004).
C.W. Churchman: The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization, New York: Basic Books (1971).
J.F. Courtney, D.T. Croasdell, D.B. Paradice: Inquiring Organizations, Australian Journal of Information Systems (6:1), pp.3-14 (1998).
J. De Visch: The Vertical Dimension, Mechelen, Belgium: Connect & Transform Press (2010).
G. Doucet, J. Gøtze, P. Saha, S. Bernard: Coherency Management: Using Enterprise Architecture for Alignment, Agility, and Assurance, Journal of Enterprise Architecture, May 2008, pp.1-12 (2008).
G. Doucet, J. Gotze, P. Saha, S. Bernard (Eds.): Coherency Management, International Enterprise Architecture Institute (2009).
M. Edwards: ”It’s just a phase I’m going through”: Integral Lenses and Phase Transitions in Organizational Transformation, Annual Meeting of ECCON – Phase Transitions in Organizations (2007).
D.A. Fisher: An Emergent Perspective on Interoperation in Systems of Systems, Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (2006).
J.W. Fowler, H. Streib, B. Keller (Eds.): Manual for Faith Development Research, 3rd Edition (2004).
P.J. Hagan (Ed.): EABOK: Guide to the (Evolving) Enterprise Architecture Body of Knowledge (Draft), The MITRE Corporation, February 6, 2004.
L. Hoebeke: Making Work Systems Better: A Practitioner’s Reflections, John Wiley & Sons (1994).
K. Hjort-Madsen: Institutional Patterns of Enterprise Architecture Adoption in Government, Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy (1:4), pp.333-349 (2007).
E. Jaques: Requisite Organization: The CEO’s Guide to Creative Structure and Leadership, Arlington, VA: Cason Hall & Co. Publishers (1989).
S. Kaisler, F. Armour, M. Valivullah: Enterprise Architecting: Critical Problems, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference, January 3-6, 2005.
P.M. King, K.S. Kitchener: Developing Reflective Judgment, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers (1994).
J.J. Korhonen, K. Hiekkanen, J. Lähteenmäki: EA and IT Governance – A Systemic Approach, in 5th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, J. Politis (Ed.), Athens, p.66–74, Reading, UK: Academic Publishing Limited, November 5-6, 2009.
J.J. Korhonen, K. Hiekkanen, M. Heiskala: Map to Service-Oriented Business and IT: A Stratified Approach, Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2010), Lima, Peru, August 12-15, 2010.
J.J. Korhonen: Enterprise Architecture and EA Governance: A Stratified Approach, in Systems Thinking in Enterprise Architecture, J. Gøtze, A. Jensen-Waud (Eds.), College Publications.
C.F. Kurtz, D.J. Snowden: The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-Making in a Complex and Complicated World, IBM Systems Journal (42:3), pp.462-483 (2003).
M. Lankhorst: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modeling, Communication, and Analysis, Second Edition. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (2009).
J. Lapalme: Three Schools of Enterprise Architecture, IT Professional, IEEE computer Society Digital Library, IEEE Computer Society, December 14, 2011; refer to: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.109.
Y. Malhotra: Knowledge Management in Inquiring Organizations, Proceedings of 3rd Americas Conference on Information Systems, Indianapolis, IN, pp.293-295, August 15- 17, 1997.
J. McMorland: Are you big enough for your job? Is your job big enough for you? Exploring Levels of Work in Organizations, University of Auckland Business Review (7:2), pp.75–83 (2005).
T. Parsons: Structure and Process in Modern Societies, New York: Free Press (1960).
R. Peterson: Crafting Information Technology Governance, EDPACS – The EDP Audit, Control, and Security Newsletter (32:6), pp.1-24 (2004).
J. Poutanen: The Social Dimension of Enterprise Architecture in Government, Journal of Enterprise Architecture, pp.19-29 (May 2012).
R. Rowbottom, D. Billis: Organizational Design, Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing Company Limited (1987).
E. Schein: Three Cultures of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning, Sloan Management Review. Fall (1996).
S.L. Star, J.R. Griesemer: Institutional Ecology, ”Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39, Social Studies of Science (19), pp.387-420 (1989).
J.D. Thompson: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill (1967).
G. Versteeg, H. Bouwman: Business Architecture: A New Paradigm to Relate Business Strategy to ICT, Information Systems Frontiers (8), pp.91-102 (2006).
Journal of Enterprise Architecture