Better Business-IT Alignment Through Enterprise Architecture: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Keywords: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Anna Sidorova and Leon A. Kappelman


Enterprise architecture has attracted the attention of information systems (IS) academics as well as information technology (IT) and business professionals. While enterprise architecture has been proposed as a solution to the business-IT alignment problem, there is little theoretical basis that would explain how enterprise architecture work can lead to better alignment. Here we draw on the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to highlight the role of enterprise architecture in achieving and sustaining such alignment. Specifically, we argue that enterprise architecture work helps to achieve agreement and thus alignment of the interests of internal actors within the context of enterprise interests and inscribes such agreement into architectural artifacts. Such artifacts can then be used in negotiations with external parties, such as IT vendors, thereby protecting the interests of the enterprise. Enterprise architecture work is also likely to reduce the likelihood of members of the enterprise, such as IT staff, from forming close ties with external parties, such as IT solution vendors, at the expense of the interests of the enterprise. We argue that this would result in stronger business-IT alignment. We conclude by highlighting two important goals of enterprise architecture as viewed through the ANT lens: (1) to help achieve an alignment of interests within the enterprise, and (2) to serve as a tool for protecting the interests of the enterprise in internal and external negotiations. These in turn point to the importance of the soft skills of enterprise architects and the need for clear and readily understandable enterprise architecture artifacts.


Anna Sidorova, PhD is Assistant Professor of IS and Leon A. Kappelman, PhD is Professor of IS, both at the Information Technology and Decision Sciences Department, College of Business, University of North Texas.


Callon M.: Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen. In J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 197–225 (1996).

Callon M., Latour B.: Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K.D. Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge, pp. 277–303 (1981).

Chen P.P.: The Entity Relationship Model – Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1:1 (1976).

CIO Council: Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF), US Office of Management and Budget (1999).

CIO Council: A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture, Version 1.0, Chief Information Officer Council of OMB and the US General Accountability Office, at (2001).

Collett S.: Hot Skills, Cold Skills. Computerworld, July 17, at cleBasic&articleId=112360 on 1-January-2011 (2006).

Davis G.B.: Strategies for Information Requirements Determination. IBM Systems Journal, 21:1, pp.4-30 (1982).

DeMarco T.: Structured Analysis and System Specification, New York: Yourdon Press (1978).

El Sawy O. Malhotra,A., Gosain S., Young K.: IT-Intensive Value Innovation in the Electronic Economy: Insights from Marshall Industries, MIS Quarterly, 23:3, pp.305-335 (1999).

Finkelstein C, Martin J.: Information Engineering, Volumes 1 and 2, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1981).

GAO: A Framework for Assessing and Improving Enterprise Architecture Management (Version 1.1) GAO-03-584G, US General Accounting Office, (2003).

Hagan P.J. (Editor): Guide to the (Evolving) Enterprise Architecture Body of Knowledge, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA. 04_0104/04_0104.pdf (2004).

Hanseth O, Jacucci E, Grisot M., Aanestad M.: Reflexive Standardization: Side Effects and Complexity in Standard Making, MIS Quarterly, 30:Special Issue, pp. 563-581 (2006).

Heikki T., Valacich J.S., Kaiser K., Nunamaker Jr. J.F., Sipior J.C., de Vreede G.J., Wright R.T.: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems, Joint IS 2009 Curriculum Taskforce of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and Association for Information Systems (AIS), at (2009).

Kappelman L.A.: Bridging the Chasm, Architecture and Governance Magazine, 3(2), p.28. Also in Kappelman (2010), pp 35-36 (2007).

Kappelman L.A. (Editor): The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture, CRC Press, NY (2010).

Latour B.: Where are the missing masses? The sociology of some mundane artifacts. In W.E. Bijker and J. Law (Editors), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.225–258 (1992).

Latour B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor- Network-Theory, New York: Oxford University Press (2005).

Law J.: Networks, Relations, Cyborgs: on the Social Study of Technology, published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, at pdf (2000).

Law J.: Ordering and Obduracy, published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, at Obduracy.pdf (2003).

Luftman J., Kempaiah R.: An Update on Business-IT Alignment: A Line Has Been Drawn, MIS Quarterly Executive, 6:3, September, 165-177 (2007).

Miller D.: Enterprise Client/Server Planning, Information Systems Management, 14:2, pp.7-15 (1997). Monteiro E.: Monsters: From Systems to Actor-Networks. In K. Braa, C. Sorenson, & B. Dahlbom (Editors), Planet Internet. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, pp.239-249 (2000).

Newton T.: Creating the New Ecological Order? Elias and Actor-Network Theory, Academy of Management Review, 2002, Vol. 27, No. 4, 523-540.

Ross J.W., Weill P., Robertson D.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (2006).

Ross J.W.: Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages, MISQ Executive, 2:1 (2003).

Salmans B., Kappelman: The State of EA: Progress Not Perfection, in Kappelman L.A. (Editor): The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture, CRC Press, NY (2010).

Sarker S, Sarker, S. Sidorova: Understanding Business Process Change Failure: An Actor-Network Perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, Summer, 23:1, pp.51–86 (2003).

Senge P.: The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday: NY, NY (1990).

Simons G., Kappelman L., Zachman J.: Enterprise Architecture as Language, in Aiguer M., Bretaudeau F., Krob D. (Editors): Complex Systems Design and Management, Berlin: Springer- Verlag. Also in Kappelman (2010), pp.127-146 (2010).

Spewak S.H.: Enterprise Architecture Planning: Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications, and Technology, New York: John Wiley & Sons (1993).

Venkatesh V., Bala H., Venkatraman S., Bates J.: Enterprise Architecture Maturity: The Story of the Veteran‟s Health Administration, MISQ Executive, 6:2, pp.79-90 (2007).

Walsham G.: Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. In A.S. Lee, J. Liebenau, J.I. DeGross (Editors): Information Systems and Qualitative Research. London: Chapman & Hall, pp.466–480 (1997).

Walsham G., Sahay S.: GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities, MIS Quarterly, 23:1, 39–66 (1999).

Yourdon Ed.: Techniques of Program Structure and Design, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1975).

Zachman J.A.: A Framework for Information Systems Architecture, IBM Systems Journal, 26:3, pp.276-292 (1987).

Zachman J.A.: John Zachman‟s concise definition of the Zachman Framework, in Kappelman (2010), pp.61-65 (2010).

Zachman J.A.: Architecture is Architecture is Architecture, in Kappelman (2010), pp.37-45 (2010).

Zachman J.A., Sowa: Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture, IBM Systems Journal, 31:3, pp.590–616 (1992).

An earlier version of this article appears in The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture, Kappelman L.A. (Editor), CRC Press as Enterprise Architecture as Politics: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective, pp. 70-88 (2010).

Journal of Enterprise Architecture

Leave a Comment