John Chi-Zong Wu
This article proposes a Complex Adaptive Architecture (CAA) method to architect an organic enterprise. It presents a complicated concept in a simple 3×3 matrix bonded by three architecture theories and a three-tiered architecture approach. CAA recognizes that SOA and Cloud Computing is a horizontal architecture practice which cannot be accomplished with the traditional top-down approach. The horizontal architecture consists of the discipline of learning from the experience of others, the discipline of engineering of re-use and consolidation, and the discipline to facilitate buy-in from stakeholders. CAA also discovers that the business community is making decisions based on influence relation rather than structural relation. Coherence Architecture theory is based on enterprise influence modeling and coherence modeling for the purpose of supporting enterprise strategic planning and decision-making. The Coherence Architecture consists of the discipline of influence modeling and the discipline of analogical reasoning. CAA embraces continuous change with a three-tiered architecture approach. The initial tier is the Notional Architecture which serves much like a master plan in city planning. The second tier is the Segment Architecture to close the business performance gaps due to change. The third tier is the daily Enterprise Architecture (EA) to enable an agile solution architecture.
Enterprise Architecture, Complex System, Organic, Adapting to Change, Horizontal Architecture, Alignment, Agility,Coherence, Influence Model, Analogical Reasoning, Notional Architecture, Segment Architecture, Solution Architecture,Reference Model, Reference Architecture, SOA, Cloud Computing, Security, Risk Management
About the author
John Chi-Zong Wu has worked in the field of Enterprise Architecture since 1998 in the Washington DC area. He is the author of Light Enterprise Architecture (liteea.com).
Agile Manifesto: Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001).
China, Wu-Xing: The Five Elements.
G. Doucet, J. Gøtze, P. Saha, S. Bernard: Coherency Management: Using Enterprise Architecture for Alignment, Agility, and Assurance, Journal of Enterprise Architecture, May 2008.
T. Grave: SEMPER and SCORE: Enhancing Enterprise Effectiveness (2008).
IBM Global Technology Services: Get More out of Cloud with a Structured Workload Analysis (2011).
R.A. Howard, J.E. Matheson: Influence Diagrams, in Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, R.A. Howard and J.E. Matheson (Eds), Vol. II, Menlo Park CA: Strategic Decisions Group (1984).
J. Adams, S. Koushik, G. Vasudeva, G. Galambos: IBM Patterns for e-business: A Strategy for Re-Use (2011)
M. Oberhofer and A. Dreibelbis: The Introduction to the Master Data Management Reference Architecture, IBM (2008).
J.H. Holland, M. Gell-Mann et al.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (1975).
The Open Group: The TOGAF® Standard (1995).
Roebuck Roy General Endeavor Management (GEM) and Endeavor Management Architecture (EMA): One World Information System (1981).
K. Smith, T.S. Graves: An Introduction to PEAF: Pragmatic Enterprise Architecture Framework (2012).
D. Snowden: Cynefin, A Sense of Time and Place: An Ecological Approach to Sense-Making and Learning in Formal and Informal Communities, Conference Proceedings of KMAC at the University of Aston, July (2000).
State of California: Consolidation Plan Reference Manual: Charter, Methodology and Plan plus Progress Reporting (2009).
J. Sowa, A. Majundar: Analogical Reasoning, published in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Structures in Dresden, Germany, July (2003).
S.H. Spewak, S.C. Hill: Enterprise Architecture Planning – Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications, and Technology, John Wiley & Sons (1993).
UK Ministry of Defense: Ministry of Defense Architecture Framework (MODAF) (2005).
US OMB: FEA Consolidated Reference Model Document (2007).
US CIO Council: The Federal Segment Architecture Method (2008).
US CIO Council: A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture, US Office of Management and Budget (1999).
US CIO Council: Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF), US Office of Management and Budget (2001).
US DoD: DoDAF Architecture Framework developed by the DoDAF Working Group (2003).
J.C. Wu: Enterprise Architecture: A Cross-cutting Solution, Cutter Consortium Enterprise Architecture Advisory Service Executive Update, Vol. 10, No. 6 (2007).
J.A. Zachman: Enterprise Architecture Artifacts versus Application Development Artifacts, Zachman International (2000).
Journal of Enterprise Architecture