The importance of Enterprise Architecture (EA) to enterprise transformation has been identified by an increasing number of companies as well as public sector actors. However, the literature to date does not provide much empirical evidence of the benefits of EA. In this article, we evaluate empirically the potential benefits of the EA approach in Concept Development and Experimentation (CD&E), which is considered a tool to drive strategic transformation in the military community. The DeLone and McLean information system success model is used as an evaluation framework. The research method in the article is a case study. The results of the case study are analyzed statistically. The results suggest that the EA approach could benefit CD&E. The EA approach supports the further utilization of the military concept, which is a life-cycle stage preceding military capability development. The applicability of the evaluation framework needs further research.
Aier S., Kurpjuweit S., Saat J., and Winter R.: Enterprise Architecture Design as an Engineering Discipline, AIS Transactions on Enterprise Systems (1:1), (2009), pp.36-43.
Alghamdi A.S.: Evaluating Defense Architecture Frameworks for C4I System Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Computer Science (5:12), (2009), pp.1075-1081.
Baumgarten E. and Silverman S.J.: Dynamic DoDAF and Executable Architectures, Military Communications Conference, IEEE MILCOM (2007), pp.1-5.
Boster M., Simon L., and Thomas R.: Getting the Most from your Enterprise Architecture, IT Professional (2:4), (2000), pp.43-51.
Boucharas V., van Steenbergen M., Jansen S., and Brinkkemper S.: The Contribution of Enterprise Architecture to the Achievement of Organizational Goals: A Review of the Evidence, in Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research, Proper E., Lankhorst M.M., Schönherr M., Barjis J., and Overbeek S. (Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2010), pp.1-15.
Bucher T., Fischer R., Kurpjuweit S. and Winter R.: Analysis and Application Scenarios of Enterprise Architecture: An Exploratory Study, 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (2006), pp.28-28.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: Joint Operations Concept Development Process (JOpsC-DP), Washington DC, USA (2006).
Chen D., Doumeingts G., and Vernadat F.: Architectures for Enterprise Integration and Interoperability: Past, Present, and Future, Computers in Industry (59:7), (2008), pp.647-659.
Command & Control Research Program (CCRP): Code of Best Practice Experimentation, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (OASD), Washington DC, USA (2002).
Delone W.H. and McLean E.R.: The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, J. Manage. Inf. Syst. (19:4), (2003), pp.9-30.
Dryer D.A., Bock T., Broschi M., and Beach T.D.: DoDAF Limitations and Enhancements for the Capability Test Methodology, in Proceedings of the 2007 Spring Simulation Multi-conference, Volume 3, Society for Computer Simulation International, Norfolk, Virginia (2007), pp.170-176.
GAO – United States Government Accountability Office 2010. Organizational Transformation: A Framework for Assessing and Improving Enterprise Architecture Management (Version 2.0), GAO-10-846G, Washington DC, USA.
Hjort-Madsen K.: Enterprise Architecture Implementation and Management: A Case Study on Interoperability, in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 71c-71c (January 2006).
Hoffman F.G.: Complex Irregular Warfare: The Next Revolution in Military Affairs, Orbis (50:3), (2006), pp.395-411.
Hornby A.S., Wehmeier S., McIntosh C., Turnbull J., and Ashby M.: Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005), pp.xii,1790,1795,1179.
IEEE – The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Std 1471-2000: Systems and Software Engineering — Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, New York, USA (2007).
IFIP–IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration: GERAM: The Generalized Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology (1.6.3), (1999).
ISO – International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14258:1998: Industrial Automation Systems – Concepts and Rules ror Enterprise Model, Geneva, Switzerland (1998).
ISO – International Organization for Standardization: ISO 15704:2005: Industrial Automation Systems – Requirements for Enterprise – Reference Architectures and Methodologies, Geneva, Switzerland (2005).
ISO – International Organization for Standrardization: ISO 19439:2006(E): Enterprise Integration – Framework for Enterprise Modelling, Geneva, Switzerland (2006).
Jonkers H., Lankhorst M., Ter Doest H., Arbab F., Bosma H., and Wieringa R.: Enterprise Architecture: Management Tool and Blueprint for the Organization, Information Systems Frontiers (8:2), (2006), pp.63-66.
Kaisler S.H., Armour F., and Valivullah M.: Enterprise Architecting: Critical Problems, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii,USA (January 2005), pp.224b-224b.
Kamogawa T. and Okada H.: A Framework for Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness, International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, Vol. 741 (June 2005), pp.740-745.
Kilcullen D.: Complex Irregular Warfare: The Face of Contemporary Conflict, in The Military Balance 2005-2006, London: Institute for Strategic Studies (2005), pp.411-420.
Kluge C., Dietzsch A., and Rosemann M.: How to Realize Corporate Value from Enterprise Architecture, in Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, Ljungberg J. and Andersson M. (Eds.), CD Rom, IT University of Goteborg (2006), pp.1-12.
Lankhorst M.: A Language for Enterprise Modelling, in Enterprise Architecture at Work (2009), pp.85-119.
Liimatainen K.: Evaluating Benefits of Government Enterprise Architecture, in the 31st Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Åre, Sweden (2008).
McGinnis L.F.: Enterprise Modeling and Enterprise Transformation, Information Knowledge Systems Management (6:1/2), (2007), pp.123-143.
Namkyu L., Tae-gong L., and Sang-gun P.: A Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Based on EA Quality Attributes, 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, Daegu, South Korea (May 2009), pp.283-288.
NATO C3 Board: Nato Architecture Framework Version 3, Brussels, Belgium (2007).
NATO Military Committee: MC Policy for Nato Concept Development and Experimentation, Brussels, Belgium (2009).
Niemi E. and Pekkola S.: Adapting the DeLone and McLean Model for the Enterprise Architecture Benefit Realization Process, 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA (January 2009), pp.1-10.
Noran O.: A Systematic Evaluation of the C4ISR AF Using ISO15704 Annex A (GERAM), Computers in Industry (56:5), pp.407-427.
Reynolds K.P.: Building the Future Force: Challenges to Getting Military Transformation Right, Contemporary Security Policy (27:3), (2006), pp.435 – 471.
Ross J.W. and Weill P.: Understanding the Benefits of Enterprise Architecture, Cambridge, USA: MIT Sloan School of Management, Contract No. 2B (2006).
Ross J.W., Weill P., and Robertson D.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press (2006), pp.xviii,234.
Saulson B.: SEAS ISR Architect: Mapping Department of Defense Architecture Views to Military Outcome, The Journalof Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology (3:4), (2006), pp.217-225.
Schelp J. and Stutz M.: A Balanced Scorecard Approach to Measure the Value of the Enterprise Architecture, Via Nova Architectura [online] (2007); available at: www.via-novaarchitectura.org/files/TEAR2007/Schelp.pdf (accessed June 15, 2010).
Smolander K., Rossi M., and Purao S.: Going Beyond the Blueprint: Unravelling the Complex Reality of Software Architectures, European Conference on Information Systems, London, UK (2005).
Tang A., Han J., and Chen. P.: A Comparative Analysis of Architecture Frameworks, in 11th Asia-Pacific SoftwareEngineering Conference (November 2004), pp.640-647.
The Technical Co-operation Program: Guide for Understanding and Implementing Defense Experimentation (GUIDEx), Canadian Forces Experimentation Centre [online] (2006); available at: www.dtic.mil/ttcp/GUIDExBookFeb2006.pdf (accessed July 1, 2010).
United Kingdom Ministry of Defence: The MoDAF Architecting Process, London, UK (2009).
United States Joint Forces Command: Multi-national Experiment 6 Fact Sheet [online] (2010); available at: http://mne.oslo.mil.no:8080/Multinatio/GeneralInf/MNE6USJFCO/file/MNE%206%20Rev%20–%20JCDE%20Spotlight%20–%2019May091.pdf (accessed July 1, 2010).
United States Department of Defense: DoDAF V2.0, Volume 1: Introduction, Overview, and Concepts, Washington, DC, USA (2009).
United States Department of Defense Deputy Chief Information Officer: What is New in DoDAF V2.0, Washington DC, USA (2010).
Urbaczewski L., and Mrdalj S.: A Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks, Issues in Information Systems (7:2),pp.18-23.
Velitchkov I.: Enterprise Architecture Metrics in the Balanced Scorecard for IT (JOnline), in: JournalOnline Vol. 3 [online](2009); available at: www.isaca.org/Journal/Past-Issues/2009/Volume-3/Documents/jpdf0903-onlineenterprise.pdf (accessed July 2, 2010).
Yu E., Strohmaier M., and Deng X.: Exploring Intentional Modeling and Analysis for Enterprise Architecture, in Proceedings of the 10th IEEE on International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, Hong Kong, China (October 2006), p.32.
Yue Y. and Henshaw M.: A Holistic View of UK Military Capability Development, Defense & Security Analysis (25:1),(2009), pp.53-67.
Journal of Enterprise Architecture