Existing approaches to the problems in the governance of Enterprise Architecture (EA) implementation are characterized largely as unambiguous and objective. Using the case study of a large Australian financial services organization, one such approach is examined critically. Existing governance approaches espouse generic solutions such as new governance structures, architectural modularity, decision-making models, frameworks, inter-organizational relations, and evolutionary rather than big-bang approaches. This study draws on the machine, organism, and brain metaphors from Morgan’s Images of Organizations (1986, 1997, 2006) to capture the contradictory and competing images and assumptions associated with the governance of an EA implementation and the social behaviors they imply. Findings from this case study suggest that the current emphasis on technical solutions is an oversight and that a broader approach, one that encompasses a partnership of technical and qualitative approaches, is required. Metaphors can be used to provide important insights into the attitudes and behaviors of Enterprise Architects toward their stakeholders and the assumptions they make about the social context of an EA implementation. It will be shown that metaphors provide Enterprise Architects with context-sensitive tools that allow them to fully appreciate the complex social world of an EA implementation.
Enterprise Architecture, Implementation Governance, Metaphors, Interpretive Approaches, Technical Approaches, Machine-Perspective, Organism-Perspective, Brain-Perspective, Symbolic Interactionism
About the author
Mark Dale has over 25 years’ experience in banking, financial services, and consulting industries in Enterprise Architecture and solution architecture roles. He is currently a PhD candidate at Swinburne University of Technology and currently teaches EA at that institution. His research interests include interpretive approaches to understanding the problems of EA implementation.
Accenture: Architecture Frameworks for Client/Server and Net-Centric Computing, in J.M. Myerson (Ed.): Enterprise Systems Integration, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp.39-78 (2002).
H. Blumer: Symbolic Interactionsim: Perspective and Methods, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (1969).
W.F. Boh, D. Yellin: Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology, Journal of Management Information Systems (23:3), pp.163-207 (2006/7).
R. Boland: Beyond the Objectivist and Subjectivist: Learning to Read Accounting as Text, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 14 (5/6), pp.591-604 (1989).
B. Bourke: City Planning: A Metaphor for Enterprise Architecture, CIO (May 2004); accessed February 12, 2012 from: www.cio.com.au/article/180920/city_planning_ metaphor_enterprise_architecture/.
G.B. Davis, R. Kling, S. Iacono: The Control of Information Systems Developments After Implementation, Communications of the ACM, 27 (12), pp1218-1226 (1984).
D.L. Goodhue, J.A. Quillard, J.F. Rockart: Managing the Data Resource: A Contingency Perspective, MIS Quarterly (12:3), pp.373-392 (1988).
D.L. Goodhue, L.J. Kirsch, J.A. Quillard, M.D. Wybo: Strategic Data Planning: Lessons from the Field, MIS Quarterly (16:1), pp.11-34 (1992).
D. Grant, C. Oswick (Eds): Metaphor and Organizations, London: Sage (1996).
R. Hirschheim, M. Newman: Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor, and Magic, Information Systems Research (2:1), pp.29-62 (1991).
R. Hirschheim, R. Sabherwal: Detours in the Path Toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment, California Management Review (44:1), pp.87-108 (2001).
R. Hite: Information Technology: A Framework for Assessing and Improving Enterprise Architecture Management (Version 1.1), White Paper, United States General Accounting Office, Washington, DC (2003); accessed February 3, 2012 from: www.gao.gov/new.items/d03584g.pdf.
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): Enterprise Governance: Getting the Balance Right, International Federation of Accountants (2004); accessed January 14, 2012 from: www.ifac.org/publications-resources/enterprisegovernance-getting-balance-right.
IT Governance Institute (ITGI): Board Briefing on IT Governance, 2nd Edition, IT Governance Institute (2003); accessed February 16, 2012 from: www.isaca.org/Knowledge-Center/Research/Documents/BoardBriefing/26904_Board_Briefing_final.pdf.
A. Josey, R. Harrison, P. Homan, M.F. Rouse, T. van Sante,M. Turner, P. van der Merwe: TOGAF® Version 9 – A Pocket Guide, Reading, UK: The Open Group (2009).
J.E. Kendall, K.E. Kendall: Metaphors and Methodologies: Living Beyond the Systems Machine, MIS Quarterly, pp.149- 171 (June 1993).
Y.G. Kim, G.C. Everest: Building an IS Architecture: Collective Wisdom from the Field, Information and Management (26:1), pp.1-11 (1994).
G.R. Khoury, S.J. Simoff: Enterprise Architecture Modelling Using Elastic Metaphors (2004); accessed February 21, 2012 from: http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV31Khoury.pdf.
J. Korhonen, K. Hiekkanen, J. Lähteenmäki: EA and IT Governance – A Systematic Approach, European Conference on Management, Leadership, and Governance (2009); accessed February 21, 2012 from: www.jannekorhonen.fi/EA_and_IT_Governance_presentation.pdf.
M.M. Lankhorst, M.E. Iacob, H. Jonkers: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication, and Analysis, Berlin: Springer-Verlag (2005).T. Lazarides: Comply! Resistance is Futile, Information Management and Computer Security (15:5), pp.339-349 (2007).
Microsoft IT Showcase: Showcase Creating a Systemized Approach to Regulatory Compliance at Microsoft, Microsoft, (2005); accessed April 25, 2012 from: www.microsoft.com/technet/itshowcase.
G. Morgan: Images of Organization, 1st Ed., Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications (1986).
G. Morgan: Images of Organization, 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications (1997).
G. Morgan: Images of Organization, 3rd Ed., Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications (2006).
OECD: Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD, Paris (2004).
M. Op’t Land, E. Proper, M. Waage, J. Cloo, C. Stehuis: Enterprise Architecture: Creating Value by Informed Governance, Berlin: Springer-Verlag (2009).
A. Pickering: The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future, London: University of Chicago Press (2010).
D. Pultorak: Exploring the Intersection of Service-Level Management and Corporate Governance, BetterManagement.com Web Seminar (December 2003).
D. Pultorak: IT Governance: Toward a Unified Framework Linked to and Driven by Corporate Governance, in P. Laplante and T. Costello: CIO Wisdom II: More Best Practices, Prentice- Hall (2005).
D. Pultorak, J. Kerrigan: Conformance, Performance, and Rapport: A Framework for Corporate and IT Governance, NACD Directors Monthly (2005); accessed February 16, 2012 from: www.itsmwatch.com/img/cpr.pdf.
J. Ross: Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages, MIS Quarterly Executive (2:1), pp.31-43 (2003).
J. Ross, P. Weill, D. Robertson: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Execution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press (2006).
M. Salle: IT Service Management and IT Governance: Review, Comparative Analysis, and their Impact on Utility Computing,Hewlett Packard, Paolo Alto (2004); accessed February 16, 2012 from: www.itu.dk/courses/SISM/E2010/Salle_2004.pdf.
G.J. Selig, P. Waterhouse: IT Governance – An Integrated Framework and Roadmap: How to Plan, Deploy, and Sustain for Competitive Advantage, Computer Associates (2006); accessed January 14, 2012 from: www.techrepublic.com/whitepapers/it-governance-anintegrated-framework-and-roadmap-how-to-plan-deploy-andsustain-for-competitive-advantage/237478.
L. Smircich: Studying Organizations as Cultures, in G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage (1983).
K. Smolander, M. Rossi, S. Purao: Software Architectures: Blueprint, Literature, Language, or Decision?, European Journal of Information Systems (17), pp.575- 588 (2008).
A. Tiwana, B. Konsynski: Complementarities Between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure, Information Systems Research (21:2), pp.288-304 (2010).
J. Van Bon, K. Brand, H. Boonen: IT Governance Based on COBIT 4.1: A Management Guide, ITSM Library (2007); accessed from:http://swin.eblib.com.au.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?….
W. Van Grembergen, S. De Haes: IT Governance and its Mechanisms, Information Systems Control Journal (1) (2004); accessed February 16, 2012 from:www.isaca.org/Journal/Past-Issues/2004/Volume-1/Pages/ITGovernance-and-Its-Mechanisms.aspx.
W. Van Grembergen, S. De Haes: Practices in IT Governance and Business/IT Alignment, Information Systems Audit and Control Journal (l2) (2008); accessed July 15, 2012 from: www.isaca.org/Journal/Past-Issues/2008/Volume-2/Pages/Practices-in-IT-Governance-and-Business-ITAlignment1.aspx.
V. Venkatesh, H. Bala, S. Venkatraman, J. Bates: Enterprise Architecture Maturity: The Story of the Veterans Health Administration, MIS Quarterly (6:2), pp.79-90 (2007).
P. Weill, M. Broadbent: Leveraging the New Infrastructure, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press (1998).
P. Weill, J.W. Ross: IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press (2004).
E. Wheeler: Security Risk Management: Building an Information Risk Management Program from the Ground Up, Syngress (2001); accessed from: http://swin.eblib.com.au.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/patron/SearchResults.aspx?q=risk+manangement.
W. Winter, T. Szczepanek: Images of Projects, London: Gower Publishing (2009).
Journal of Enterprise Architecture